Hater hypocrisy

Hater hypocrisy

Postby welshman » Sat Sep 06, 2014 3:17 pm

The purpose of this thread is to highlight the hypocrisy of the haters which I feels needs to come under scrutiny.

Hater claim: Amanda, Raffaele, their supporters and the PR company spread lies. Why this claim is hypocritical: This claim is hypocritical for the following reasons :-

There are 15 documented instances of the prosecution lying and the haters slavishly support and defend the prosecution.
The haters spread lies in the comments of articles about the case and Amazon reviews as can be seen from my strong case thread?
The media spread all kinds of lies. The haters never complained about this.
The lifetime movie was riddled with falsehoods. The haters never complained about this.
Rudy told numerous lies. The haters never condem him for lying and many haters admire Guede.
The Nenci report was full of falsehoods. The haters have not attacked judge Nenci.
The haters gave glowing 5 star reviews to John Kercher's book Meredith which was full of falsehoods.
Members of TJMK have lied about having scientific credentials.

Hater claim: Judge Hellman was corrupt and was paid off by the masons a claim which was often made by Machiavelli. Why this claim is hypocritical: The haters slavishly support and defend corrupt police officers and prosecutors who violated the rights of Amanda and Raffaele during the interrogations, told numerous lies, suppressed evidence and committed fraud with regards to forensic evidence.

Hater claim: Amanda hired a PR firm which had a malign influence. Why this claim is hypocritical: The media provided a very effective PR machine for the prosecution in various ways. The media made vicious attacks on Amanda's character. The prosecution used the media to spread lies. The media did not report many facts about the case such as the numerous lies told by the prosecution, the evidence suppressed, Stefanoni's lab not having the facilities to carry out low LCN DNA. The prosecution had mouthpieces in the media such as John Follain, Barbara Nadeu and Andrea Vogt. The TJMK/PMF hate sites have provided very effective PR for the prosecution. The haters do not complain about the prosecution having a very effective PR machine.

Hater claim: Amanda and Raffaele's supporters are are all buffoons who are not in a position to talk about the case and have no expertise. Why this claim is hypocritical: The police made massive blunders when they were collecting forensic evidence at the cottage. Steffanoni did not have the facilities to carry out lCN DNA. It is hypocritical to accuse Amanda and Raffaele's supporters of being idiots whilst defending incompetent forensic scientists.

It is hypocritical to accuse Amanda and Raffaele's supporters of having no expertise when members of TJMK have lied about their expertise and none of the members of TJMK/PMF have worked as forensic scientists or police officers. This makes it hypocritical to accuse Amanda and Raffaele's supporters of having no expertise.

Hater claim: Mignini is a noble man who has the been the victim of an unjustified smear campaign. Why this claim is hypocritical: On the comments sections of a ground report article I asked the haters if they would be happy if Mignini was the prosecutor if they were accused of a crime. The haters were unwilling to answer this question. It is hypocritical to praise Mignini whilst being seemingly unwilling to have Mignini as a prosecutor if they were charged with a crime.
welshman
 
Posts: 736
Joined: Mon Oct 04, 2010 10:49 am

Return to Injustice in Perugia Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Numbers and 5 guests