Today over at TJMK

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby RoseMontague » Mon Jan 27, 2014 2:46 pm

Hans wrote:Just for the record:
Warning: Do not have anything in your mouth when opening the spoiler (I was lucky to have a spare keyboard the one replaced got soaked in beer...) ::Cheers::
Bjorn on 01/26/14 at 03:56 PM |# wrote:Hi, Peter, speaking of phony websites, here’s a satanic one, in content, style, and authorship (Bruce Fischer, possibly others):

http://murderofmeredithkercher.com/

masquerading as the known: http://themurderofmeredithkercher.com/

The use of Meredith’s pictures by Bruce Fischer & The Other Rats is absolutely stomach-turning, as well as the rest of the lamebrain stuff they post there.

(Chami, just saw your post, I thought you were against instant justice - ‘justice must wait until passions die down’ ...)

Peter Quennell on 01/26/14 at 05:06 PM wrote:Hi Bjorn

All such sites are put up by Chris Mellas and the long-winded and childish prose is by Bruce Fischer.

They deliberately mistate hard evidence and make false accusations of crimes and you can bet they are on the Italian radar. (And doing Knox no good at all.)

The notion that all of Italy is being fooled and anyone standing for justice and against dishonest PR and world-beating blood money is a hater is pretty lame.

The myriad sites have increasingly less traction and will make not the slightest difference to justice being carried out. There were better things they could have been doing.

Urbanist on 01/26/14 at 06:00 PM wrote:The phony site below is registered on the launchpad server, might not get much traction but I’m sending them an email nonetheless…. abuse@launchpad.com

http://murderofmeredithkercher.com/

Report Abuse, Fraud, Hacking, Phishing or Spamming

To report an abusive site or abusive activity, please either submit this form, call us at 713-574-5287 ext. 1003, or email us at abuse@launchpad.com so that we can investigate the site or activity accordingly.

Peter Quennell on 01/26/14 at 08:23 PM wrote:Hi Urbanist

On the defamatory site hosted by Launchpad. Much appreciated.

We have an email for such occasions that proves highly effective. I dont want to post it but would share it if you or anyone registered wants to do more of the good work in atking down sites that are not constructive.

Specifically with regard to Launchpad. It is or was owned by Matthew Revell. Can you see a direct email address for him anywhere?

chami on 01/27/14 at 09:36 AM wrote:Hi Urbanist,

I also suggest that you mention that the deliberate similarity of the url or http address of the two sites is intentionally designed to confuse unsuspecting visitors whose first and foremost interest is to access basic and unbiased information in its native format or in translation.

One site contains information and the other one is crude propaganda.

Peter Quennell on 01/27/14 at 12:54 wrote:Hi Urbanist and Chami

Launchpad (Hostgator) simply sent back a notice saying defamation is none of their concern.

So I emailed them this.

***********

Hi guys

This below is totally irrelevant and off the point. I am not talking about defamation and other civil crimes.

I am pointing out to help you that you are being made a party to serious felony crimes involving mafia for which jail time and huge fines are the normal reward.

Plus there will be no heads-up from Italy or the FBI: you will simply be charged. I told you already three trials are under way.

If you need a lawyer to walk you through this let me know.

Pete Quennell

chami on 01/27/14 at 03:20 PM wrote:@Peter

I am impressed.

The host, even after being informed of the implications, continues to host offensive contents. He simply lost the best defense: I was not aware!

I am sure he would have thought twice if American people were involved in the defamation.

But frankly speaking, it is not going to have much impact in the next three days.

Good marketing means that the customer will not even be aware that he has been sold a good that he does not need or want. A marketing firm certainly could have shown some more professionality.

Even I could have done better!
:coke:


This is too funny. Thanks, Hans.
User avatar
RoseMontague
 
Posts: 3526
Joined: Sun May 30, 2010 7:04 am

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby couldbeher » Mon Jan 27, 2014 4:12 pm

Satanic?! Oh come on now, which one of us is undercover as Bjorn? I can't believe that description slipped through without comment. And BTW, I thought the haters were trying to move away from the "satanic ritual" theory, you know, because they are trying to be REALISTIC.

I think we need a smiley face in a straightjacket.
couldbeher
 
Posts: 282
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 9:56 pm

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby Bruce Fischer » Mon Jan 27, 2014 4:21 pm

RoseMontague wrote:
Hans wrote:Just for the record:
Warning: Do not have anything in your mouth when opening the spoiler (I was lucky to have a spare keyboard the one replaced got soaked in beer...) ::Cheers::
Bjorn on 01/26/14 at 03:56 PM |# wrote:Hi, Peter, speaking of phony websites, here’s a satanic one, in content, style, and authorship (Bruce Fischer, possibly others):

http://murderofmeredithkercher.com/

masquerading as the known: http://themurderofmeredithkercher.com/

The use of Meredith’s pictures by Bruce Fischer & The Other Rats is absolutely stomach-turning, as well as the rest of the lamebrain stuff they post there.

(Chami, just saw your post, I thought you were against instant justice - ‘justice must wait until passions die down’ ...)

Peter Quennell on 01/26/14 at 05:06 PM wrote:Hi Bjorn

All such sites are put up by Chris Mellas and the long-winded and childish prose is by Bruce Fischer.

They deliberately mistate hard evidence and make false accusations of crimes and you can bet they are on the Italian radar. (And doing Knox no good at all.)

The notion that all of Italy is being fooled and anyone standing for justice and against dishonest PR and world-beating blood money is a hater is pretty lame.

The myriad sites have increasingly less traction and will make not the slightest difference to justice being carried out. There were better things they could have been doing.

Urbanist on 01/26/14 at 06:00 PM wrote:The phony site below is registered on the launchpad server, might not get much traction but I’m sending them an email nonetheless…. abuse@launchpad.com

http://murderofmeredithkercher.com/

Report Abuse, Fraud, Hacking, Phishing or Spamming

To report an abusive site or abusive activity, please either submit this form, call us at 713-574-5287 ext. 1003, or email us at abuse@launchpad.com so that we can investigate the site or activity accordingly.

Peter Quennell on 01/26/14 at 08:23 PM wrote:Hi Urbanist

On the defamatory site hosted by Launchpad. Much appreciated.

We have an email for such occasions that proves highly effective. I dont want to post it but would share it if you or anyone registered wants to do more of the good work in atking down sites that are not constructive.

Specifically with regard to Launchpad. It is or was owned by Matthew Revell. Can you see a direct email address for him anywhere?

chami on 01/27/14 at 09:36 AM wrote:Hi Urbanist,

I also suggest that you mention that the deliberate similarity of the url or http address of the two sites is intentionally designed to confuse unsuspecting visitors whose first and foremost interest is to access basic and unbiased information in its native format or in translation.

One site contains information and the other one is crude propaganda.

Peter Quennell on 01/27/14 at 12:54 wrote:Hi Urbanist and Chami

Launchpad (Hostgator) simply sent back a notice saying defamation is none of their concern.

So I emailed them this.

***********

Hi guys

This below is totally irrelevant and off the point. I am not talking about defamation and other civil crimes.

I am pointing out to help you that you are being made a party to serious felony crimes involving mafia for which jail time and huge fines are the normal reward.

Plus there will be no heads-up from Italy or the FBI: you will simply be charged. I told you already three trials are under way.

If you need a lawyer to walk you through this let me know.

Pete Quennell

chami on 01/27/14 at 03:20 PM wrote:@Peter

I am impressed.

The host, even after being informed of the implications, continues to host offensive contents. He simply lost the best defense: I was not aware!

I am sure he would have thought twice if American people were involved in the defamation.

But frankly speaking, it is not going to have much impact in the next three days.

Good marketing means that the customer will not even be aware that he has been sold a good that he does not need or want. A marketing firm certainly could have shown some more professionality.

Even I could have done better!
:coke:


This is too funny. Thanks, Hans.


This might require an article tonight. Quennell is truly insane.

But why even bother? Who is listening to him anyway?
"This could happen to any one of you. If you don't believe it could happen, you are either misinformed or in a state of deep denial" -- Debra Milke
User avatar
Bruce Fischer
Site Admin
 
Posts: 4470
Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 4:26 pm
Location: USA

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby Annella » Mon Jan 27, 2014 5:53 pm

It gets worse. :D

Ergon has stated ( in comments) that someone told him Raffaele had a steel wire scouring pad UNDERNEATH his kitchen sink!!

:batshit crazy::
'The Italian concept of judicial truth does not trouble itself with reality; it controls the narrative by controlling the past"
User avatar
Annella
 
Posts: 1429
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 6:19 pm

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby KayPea » Tue Jan 28, 2014 1:57 pm

PeterQ has nerve calling anyone "long-winded." Project much dearie?
“If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it.”-- Marcus Aurelius
User avatar
KayPea
 
Posts: 3310
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 11:40 pm
Location: Seattle WA

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby Dougm » Tue Jan 28, 2014 3:45 pm

RoseMontague wrote:
Hans wrote:Just for the record:
Warning: Do not have anything in your mouth when opening the spoiler (I was lucky to have a spare keyboard the one replaced got soaked in beer...) ::Cheers::
Bjorn on 01/26/14 at 03:56 PM |# wrote:Hi, Peter, speaking of phony websites, here’s a satanic one, in content, style, and authorship (Bruce Fischer, possibly others):

http://murderofmeredithkercher.com/

masquerading as the known: http://themurderofmeredithkercher.com/

The use of Meredith’s pictures by Bruce Fischer & The Other Rats is absolutely stomach-turning, as well as the rest of the lamebrain stuff they post there.

(Chami, just saw your post, I thought you were against instant justice - ‘justice must wait until passions die down’ ...)

Peter Quennell on 01/26/14 at 05:06 PM wrote:Hi Bjorn

All such sites are put up by Chris Mellas and the long-winded and childish prose is by Bruce Fischer.

They deliberately mistate hard evidence and make false accusations of crimes and you can bet they are on the Italian radar. (And doing Knox no good at all.)

The notion that all of Italy is being fooled and anyone standing for justice and against dishonest PR and world-beating blood money is a hater is pretty lame.

The myriad sites have increasingly less traction and will make not the slightest difference to justice being carried out. There were better things they could have been doing.

Urbanist on 01/26/14 at 06:00 PM wrote:The phony site below is registered on the launchpad server, might not get much traction but I’m sending them an email nonetheless…. abuse@launchpad.com

http://murderofmeredithkercher.com/

Report Abuse, Fraud, Hacking, Phishing or Spamming

To report an abusive site or abusive activity, please either submit this form, call us at 713-574-5287 ext. 1003, or email us at abuse@launchpad.com so that we can investigate the site or activity accordingly.

Peter Quennell on 01/26/14 at 08:23 PM wrote:Hi Urbanist

On the defamatory site hosted by Launchpad. Much appreciated.

We have an email for such occasions that proves highly effective. I dont want to post it but would share it if you or anyone registered wants to do more of the good work in atking down sites that are not constructive.

Specifically with regard to Launchpad. It is or was owned by Matthew Revell. Can you see a direct email address for him anywhere?

chami on 01/27/14 at 09:36 AM wrote:Hi Urbanist,

I also suggest that you mention that the deliberate similarity of the url or http address of the two sites is intentionally designed to confuse unsuspecting visitors whose first and foremost interest is to access basic and unbiased information in its native format or in translation.

One site contains information and the other one is crude propaganda.

Peter Quennell on 01/27/14 at 12:54 wrote:Hi Urbanist and Chami

Launchpad (Hostgator) simply sent back a notice saying defamation is none of their concern.

So I emailed them this.

***********

Hi guys

This below is totally irrelevant and off the point. I am not talking about defamation and other civil crimes.

I am pointing out to help you that you are being made a party to serious felony crimes involving mafia for which jail time and huge fines are the normal reward.

Plus there will be no heads-up from Italy or the FBI: you will simply be charged. I told you already three trials are under way.

If you need a lawyer to walk you through this let me know.

Pete Quennell

chami on 01/27/14 at 03:20 PM wrote:@Peter

I am impressed.

The host, even after being informed of the implications, continues to host offensive contents. He simply lost the best defense: I was not aware!

I am sure he would have thought twice if American people were involved in the defamation.

But frankly speaking, it is not going to have much impact in the next three days.

Good marketing means that the customer will not even be aware that he has been sold a good that he does not need or want. A marketing firm certainly could have shown some more professionality.

Even I could have done better!
:coke:


This is too funny. Thanks, Hans.


Yes, thank you, Hans. First I found it funny, then disturbing, then funny again! Then just weird.
When you berate someone and push them and confuse them and lie to them and convince them that they're wrong you're not finding the truth.

Amanda Knox
Dougm
Moderator
 
Posts: 3189
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 5:00 pm

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby Hans » Tue Jan 28, 2014 3:54 pm

Dougm wrote:
RoseMontague wrote:
Hans wrote:Just for the record:
Warning: Do not have anything in your mouth when opening the spoiler (I was lucky to have a spare keyboard the one replaced got soaked in beer...) ::Cheers::
Bjorn on 01/26/14 at 03:56 PM |# wrote:Hi, Peter, speaking of phony websites, here’s a satanic one, in content, style, and authorship (Bruce Fischer, possibly others):

http://murderofmeredithkercher.com/

masquerading as the known: http://themurderofmeredithkercher.com/

The use of Meredith’s pictures by Bruce Fischer & The Other Rats is absolutely stomach-turning, as well as the rest of the lamebrain stuff they post there.

(Chami, just saw your post, I thought you were against instant justice - ‘justice must wait until passions die down’ ...)

Peter Quennell on 01/26/14 at 05:06 PM wrote:Hi Bjorn

All such sites are put up by Chris Mellas and the long-winded and childish prose is by Bruce Fischer.

They deliberately mistate hard evidence and make false accusations of crimes and you can bet they are on the Italian radar. (And doing Knox no good at all.)

The notion that all of Italy is being fooled and anyone standing for justice and against dishonest PR and world-beating blood money is a hater is pretty lame.

The myriad sites have increasingly less traction and will make not the slightest difference to justice being carried out. There were better things they could have been doing.

Urbanist on 01/26/14 at 06:00 PM wrote:The phony site below is registered on the launchpad server, might not get much traction but I’m sending them an email nonetheless…. abuse@launchpad.com

http://murderofmeredithkercher.com/

Report Abuse, Fraud, Hacking, Phishing or Spamming

To report an abusive site or abusive activity, please either submit this form, call us at 713-574-5287 ext. 1003, or email us at abuse@launchpad.com so that we can investigate the site or activity accordingly.

Peter Quennell on 01/26/14 at 08:23 PM wrote:Hi Urbanist

On the defamatory site hosted by Launchpad. Much appreciated.

We have an email for such occasions that proves highly effective. I dont want to post it but would share it if you or anyone registered wants to do more of the good work in atking down sites that are not constructive.

Specifically with regard to Launchpad. It is or was owned by Matthew Revell. Can you see a direct email address for him anywhere?

chami on 01/27/14 at 09:36 AM wrote:Hi Urbanist,

I also suggest that you mention that the deliberate similarity of the url or http address of the two sites is intentionally designed to confuse unsuspecting visitors whose first and foremost interest is to access basic and unbiased information in its native format or in translation.

One site contains information and the other one is crude propaganda.

Peter Quennell on 01/27/14 at 12:54 wrote:Hi Urbanist and Chami

Launchpad (Hostgator) simply sent back a notice saying defamation is none of their concern.

So I emailed them this.

***********

Hi guys

This below is totally irrelevant and off the point. I am not talking about defamation and other civil crimes.

I am pointing out to help you that you are being made a party to serious felony crimes involving mafia for which jail time and huge fines are the normal reward.

Plus there will be no heads-up from Italy or the FBI: you will simply be charged. I told you already three trials are under way.

If you need a lawyer to walk you through this let me know.

Pete Quennell

chami on 01/27/14 at 03:20 PM wrote:@Peter

I am impressed.

The host, even after being informed of the implications, continues to host offensive contents. He simply lost the best defense: I was not aware!

I am sure he would have thought twice if American people were involved in the defamation.

But frankly speaking, it is not going to have much impact in the next three days.

Good marketing means that the customer will not even be aware that he has been sold a good that he does not need or want. A marketing firm certainly could have shown some more professionality.

Even I could have done better!
:coke:


This is too funny. Thanks, Hans.


Yes, thank you, Hans. First I found it funny, then disturbing, then funny again! Then just weird.

So Bruce :Fishy: hasn't been called, yet?
He [Raffaele] is collateral damage in the unreasonable, irresponsible, and unrelenting scapegoating of the prosecution’s grotesque caricature that is “Foxy Knoxy”
~ Amanda Knox
Hans
 
Posts: 4544
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2011 8:41 pm
Location: Germany

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby ScifiTom » Tue Jan 28, 2014 6:56 pm

Hans wrote:Just for the record:
Warning: Do not have anything in your mouth when opening the spoiler (I was lucky to have a spare keyboard the one replaced got soaked in beer...) ::Cheers::
Bjorn on 01/26/14 at 03:56 PM |# wrote:Hi, Peter, speaking of phony websites, here’s a satanic one, in content, style, and authorship (Bruce Fischer, possibly others):

http://murderofmeredithkercher.com/

masquerading as the known: http://themurderofmeredithkercher.com/

The use of Meredith’s pictures by Bruce Fischer & The Other Rats is absolutely stomach-turning, as well as the rest of the lamebrain stuff they post there.

(Chami, just saw your post, I thought you were against instant justice - ‘justice must wait until passions die down’ ...)

Peter Quennell on 01/26/14 at 05:06 PM wrote:Hi Bjorn

All such sites are put up by Chris Mellas and the long-winded and childish prose is by Bruce Fischer.

They deliberately mistate hard evidence and make false accusations of crimes and you can bet they are on the Italian radar. (And doing Knox no good at all.)

The notion that all of Italy is being fooled and anyone standing for justice and against dishonest PR and world-beating blood money is a hater is pretty lame.

The myriad sites have increasingly less traction and will make not the slightest difference to justice being carried out. There were better things they could have been doing.

Urbanist on 01/26/14 at 06:00 PM wrote:The phony site below is registered on the launchpad server, might not get much traction but I’m sending them an email nonetheless…. abuse@launchpad.com

http://murderofmeredithkercher.com/

Report Abuse, Fraud, Hacking, Phishing or Spamming

To report an abusive site or abusive activity, please either submit this form, call us at 713-574-5287 ext. 1003, or email us at abuse@launchpad.com so that we can investigate the site or activity accordingly.

Peter Quennell on 01/26/14 at 08:23 PM wrote:Hi Urbanist

On the defamatory site hosted by Launchpad. Much appreciated.

We have an email for such occasions that proves highly effective. I dont want to post it but would share it if you or anyone registered wants to do more of the good work in atking down sites that are not constructive.

Specifically with regard to Launchpad. It is or was owned by Matthew Revell. Can you see a direct email address for him anywhere?

chami on 01/27/14 at 09:36 AM wrote:Hi Urbanist,

I also suggest that you mention that the deliberate similarity of the url or http address of the two sites is intentionally designed to confuse unsuspecting visitors whose first and foremost interest is to access basic and unbiased information in its native format or in translation.

One site contains information and the other one is crude propaganda.

Peter Quennell on 01/27/14 at 12:54 wrote:Hi Urbanist and Chami

Launchpad (Hostgator) simply sent back a notice saying defamation is none of their concern.

So I emailed them this.

***********

Hi guys

This below is totally irrelevant and off the point. I am not talking about defamation and other civil crimes.

I am pointing out to help you that you are being made a party to serious felony crimes involving mafia for which jail time and huge fines are the normal reward.

Plus there will be no heads-up from Italy or the FBI: you will simply be charged. I told you already three trials are under way.

If you need a lawyer to walk you through this let me know.

Pete Quennell

chami on 01/27/14 at 03:20 PM wrote:@Peter

I am impressed.

The host, even after being informed of the implications, continues to host offensive contents. He simply lost the best defense: I was not aware!

I am sure he would have thought twice if American people were involved in the defamation.

But frankly speaking, it is not going to have much impact in the next three days.

Good marketing means that the customer will not even be aware that he has been sold a good that he does not need or want. A marketing firm certainly could have shown some more professionality.

Even I could have done better!
:coke:


To Hans

Thanks Hans, for the information, and Peter Quennell is a nut, even he doesn't get it at all. The man is totally sick and insane of understand criminal law. He opps fail again. I sometimes wonder of that silly dumb song from Britney Spears!!!
TMJ

Anne Hathaway number 1 fan

Free the Innocence 2

Free: Kirstin Lobato Las Vegas NV & Dusty Turner Norfolk VA
User avatar
ScifiTom
 
Posts: 4707
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:58 am
Location: Norfolk Va

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby Leone » Wed Jan 29, 2014 5:13 am

Bruce Fischer wrote:
RoseMontague wrote:
Hans wrote:Just for the record:
Warning: Do not have anything in your mouth when opening the spoiler (I was lucky to have a spare keyboard the one replaced got soaked in beer...) ::Cheers::
Bjorn on 01/26/14 at 03:56 PM |# wrote:Hi, Peter, speaking of phony websites, here’s a satanic one, in content, style, and authorship (Bruce Fischer, possibly others):

http://murderofmeredithkercher.com/

masquerading as the known: http://themurderofmeredithkercher.com/

The use of Meredith’s pictures by Bruce Fischer & The Other Rats is absolutely stomach-turning, as well as the rest of the lamebrain stuff they post there.

(Chami, just saw your post, I thought you were against instant justice - ‘justice must wait until passions die down’ ...)

Peter Quennell on 01/26/14 at 05:06 PM wrote:Hi Bjorn

All such sites are put up by Chris Mellas and the long-winded and childish prose is by Bruce Fischer.

They deliberately mistate hard evidence and make false accusations of crimes and you can bet they are on the Italian radar. (And doing Knox no good at all.)

The notion that all of Italy is being fooled and anyone standing for justice and against dishonest PR and world-beating blood money is a hater is pretty lame.

The myriad sites have increasingly less traction and will make not the slightest difference to justice being carried out. There were better things they could have been doing.

Urbanist on 01/26/14 at 06:00 PM wrote:The phony site below is registered on the launchpad server, might not get much traction but I’m sending them an email nonetheless…. abuse@launchpad.com

http://murderofmeredithkercher.com/

Report Abuse, Fraud, Hacking, Phishing or Spamming

To report an abusive site or abusive activity, please either submit this form, call us at 713-574-5287 ext. 1003, or email us at abuse@launchpad.com so that we can investigate the site or activity accordingly.

Peter Quennell on 01/26/14 at 08:23 PM wrote:Hi Urbanist

On the defamatory site hosted by Launchpad. Much appreciated.

We have an email for such occasions that proves highly effective. I dont want to post it but would share it if you or anyone registered wants to do more of the good work in atking down sites that are not constructive.

Specifically with regard to Launchpad. It is or was owned by Matthew Revell. Can you see a direct email address for him anywhere?

chami on 01/27/14 at 09:36 AM wrote:Hi Urbanist,

I also suggest that you mention that the deliberate similarity of the url or http address of the two sites is intentionally designed to confuse unsuspecting visitors whose first and foremost interest is to access basic and unbiased information in its native format or in translation.

One site contains information and the other one is crude propaganda.

Peter Quennell on 01/27/14 at 12:54 wrote:Hi Urbanist and Chami

Launchpad (Hostgator) simply sent back a notice saying defamation is none of their concern.

So I emailed them this.

***********

Hi guys

This below is totally irrelevant and off the point. I am not talking about defamation and other civil crimes.

I am pointing out to help you that you are being made a party to serious felony crimes involving mafia for which jail time and huge fines are the normal reward.

Plus there will be no heads-up from Italy or the FBI: you will simply be charged. I told you already three trials are under way.

If you need a lawyer to walk you through this let me know.

Pete Quennell

chami on 01/27/14 at 03:20 PM wrote:@Peter

I am impressed.

The host, even after being informed of the implications, continues to host offensive contents. He simply lost the best defense: I was not aware!

I am sure he would have thought twice if American people were involved in the defamation.

But frankly speaking, it is not going to have much impact in the next three days.

Good marketing means that the customer will not even be aware that he has been sold a good that he does not need or want. A marketing firm certainly could have shown some more professionality.

Even I could have done better!
:coke:


This is too funny. Thanks, Hans.


This might require an article tonight. Quennell is truly insane.

But why even bother? Who is listening to him anyway?


Well done for all your effort, Bruce. The haters ring-leaders are enraged!. :D
Leone
 
Posts: 1445
Joined: Mon Dec 31, 2012 7:46 am
Location: London

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby bmf1950 » Thu Jan 30, 2014 5:18 pm

I get a service unavailable 503 message today. Also, both PMF's seem to be unavailable, but in a different way.
bmf1950
 
Posts: 1383
Joined: Thu Apr 05, 2012 5:34 pm
Location: Los Angeles, California

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby AmandaIsInnocent » Fri Jan 31, 2014 8:00 pm

kindlekitten wrote:
Bruce Fischer wrote:
Dougm wrote:
Hans wrote:Just for the record... :((:
Posted by Hopeful on 01/16/14 at 11:38 AM # wrote:Mignini is awesome. He has been resoundingly acquitted on the merits. This is cause for celebration, justice shines brighter. @Peter Quennell, thank you so much for this marvelous report with historical detail of the craven attacks against Mignini and Giuttari.

Mignini rises above the vicious wolfpack of corruption once again. Let Luca Turco and his clones among FOA be the pariahs. Mignini has sought the truth from day one, with no help from any dirty and compromised factions who envy his rise to fame powered by his virtue. He epitomizes strength and honor.

Mignini and Giuttari have come out of their legal crucible shining and pure.

Mignini played fair with Amanda Knox and Sollecito despite the braying hounds of partiality who sought to bury the involvement of certain criminal students just like a rogue prosecutor tried to bury Dr. Narducci’s possible involvement in horrendous activity. Dr. Narducci may well have been heir to an illustrious family who are not at all to blame if the good doctor went off the rails and ended up murdered by a satanic sect he fooled with. His illustrious family should prove they deserve that epithet by being fearless of the truth. Yet perhaps in their human fragility or pride like certain families from Seattle and Bari they prefer to strangle any honest investigation of their loved one’s criminal tendencies. The justice system shook off their tentacles.

Mignini has long had to battle entrenched powers and prejudices to pull justice from the mire of human decay, a thankless task that is ultimately the life breath of his region. May he rule wisely when he arrives in top post as Umbrian chief prosecutor after Galati.

Mignini is Number One, top drawer, a blue ribbon mensch, a terror to wrongdoers. Let them tremble and feel the sword of justice instead of wielding knives against the helpless.

This post has filled me with encouragement. Also the beautiful depiction of Perugia in the preceding post fills me with longing for that radiant place full of energy, culture, opportunity, all of which two young hoodlums wasted completely. They could have had it all and Meredith could have, too.

Amanda might have married Raffaele in some gorgeous cathedral in Italy, invited Meredith and the Pergola cottage friends to the wedding, then travelled on her honeymoon to 11 cities throughout Italy, taking photos, buying souvenirs, sending happy messages back to the doctor and Mara, happy emails back to her mom and sisters in Seattle, then eventually helping launch Raffaele in some fabulous high tech company on the West Coast of USA making good money. They could have invited his doctor dad to tour the US, and carried their children back to Rome for christening and more sightseeing. They could have been an international family full of promise. Instead it’s as Sicilians say, “a flame for a year, ashes for 30 years.”

It’s good to remember the glories of Perugia and Perugia’s prosecutor Mignini humbly doing his job in his historical city.

Mignini is a friend to justice everywhere. The likeminded champions of justice in Florence extend the right hand of fellowship to him as their glorious equal. We salute them for their mutual high principles, often adhered to at great personal cost. Great news of his acquittal.


I heard about this, and just HAD to do this.

:batshit crazy:: :batshit crazy:: :batshit crazy:: :batshit crazy:: :batshit crazy:: :batshit crazy:: :batshit crazy::


The funny thing is that you followed the fake rule about 7 smileys in a single row! haha


I think I just threw up a little in my mouth ::sorry::


You know, I just joined today and this is only my second post. I read this and I'm actually kind of speechless, which doesn't happen often.

Jesus f***ing Christ, who are these people??!! This is bordering on worship, and it's awfully, awfully, awfully creepy and quite disturbing!

I have been following Amanda's case for several years now, and the one thing that has and continues to shock me is the despicable and abject hatred that these guilters have for her. It is as if they want to do everything they can to destroy her, short of killing her. I would like to ask the family of Meredith Kercher why this is acceptable to them, and how does this in any way honor the memory of their loved one?

And if I didn't know any better, it seems to me these guilters, these useless excuses for human beings, have all-but elevated Ms. Kercher to sainthood. I'm sure she was a nice person, and she certainly didn't deserve what happened to her, but Jesus f***ing Christ! The way these people talk about her, you'd think she must have sh*t golden turds or something, while Amanda may just as well be indwelt by Satan himself! You guys who run this site, my hat's off to you. (If there was a hat-tipping avatar, I'd put it here). You obviously have far more grace and patience than I would have, because I have an incredibly difficult time dealing with moronic idiots. And trust me, there's much worse I want to call them.

You know what else I have often wondered? What if things were reversed? What if it had been AMANDA who had been murdered that night, and suspicion was thrust upon Meredith? These guilters who continue to assassinate Amanda's character and say the most vile and wretched things about her, often excuse their vitriol by pointing out how Amanda is deserving of it because she "got a ticket because a party was too loud", or she "staged a break-in", or had "multiple sex partners" and smoked weed, so all of these things "obviously demonstrate she is a vile murderess!". WTF!?? So I wonder what we would find if the tables were turned and we dug into Meredith Kercher's past? According to what I've read, Meredith also liked to party and she liked to smoke a little weed now and then. Did she engage in sex at any time in her life? Probably. Did she ever pull any pranks on her friends? Likely. IF the tables were turned, would anyone conclude that any of those things point to or lead to her potentially being a killer? I have never, never, ever understood how it is that these people make such wild leaps of logic, it is beyond reason to me. If the tables were turned, it would certainly be ridiculous to come to such conclusions, yet they have done and continue to do just that in Amanda's case, and not just these pathetic losers, but the Italian police, 2 separate courts, and that low-life piece of crap, Mignini. And would they say the same vile and reprehensible things about Ms. Kercher, if situation were reversed, that they have said about Amanda? Or would they just chalk it up to "another arrogant, over-privileged American is dead, so what?" The other thing that has never made sense to me is all of the "wailing and gnashing of teeth" and the incredible sensationalism that this has turned into, kept at the forefront by the guilters. I mean, tragically, people are murdered every day around the world, but the cases that end up becoming what we think of as "high profile", either involve celebrity or multiple deaths or children or incredibly bizarre circumstances, among other things. In the grand scheme of things, if you want to boil it down to basics, who were Amanda Knox and Meredith Kercher? 2 college students studying in Italy, essentially, "nobodies", no different than most of us. But then Meredith is brutally murdered by some looser, and the local prosecutor turns his sights on Amanda merely because of how she looked? Amanda, who stayed at the crime scene and did everything she could to cooperate with the local authorities, which by the way is what we're taught here in America, and it's what innocent people do. So then Mignini, (even after the real murderer is caught), engages in this incredible campaign of character assassination and innuendo and misinformation, and as that information is disseminated and distributed, from there this whole cottage industry arises of people who decide that they absolutely hate this woman, (whom they've never met), decide she is evil incarnate because of the lies of a public official, and continue to stop at nothing to destroy her. I'd even go so far to say that if they were given the opportunity, given some of the hatred and vitriol that just oozes from their comments, they would execute Amanda and stand in line for the chance to "pull the lever". I wonder if Peter Quennell and his cronies realize that they're no better than most criminals. I mean, if you're not willing to listen to reason and all you want is blood, then what does that make you?

I'm sorry everyone, I realize this is not the best post for a 2nd one. But I have to tell you, I am fit to be tied, and I am just damned tired of all the people who refuse to see the evidence, who refuse to look at the data and listen to voices of reason like Steve Moore and Ron Hendry and so many others. Who refuse to recognize or believe that Amanda's rights were violated during her interrogation, that they used interrogation techniques that the American military has been criticized for when dealing with prisoners, and that there is no RIGHT or WRONG way to "act" in the face of the death of someone you've cared about. You know, that has always lead me to another question that I have NEVER seen even one guilter answer: If Amanda WAS really guilty, why the hell didn't she get the f**k out of dodge? Why stick around? Of course they'll say, "to try and make them think she's innocent", and that's a bunch of crap. I know reasoning and logic are difficult for them, but who, in their right mind, chooses to stick around after they've murdered someone AND not only that, but return to the scene of said murder? Especially a murder as sloppy as Meredith's was? Oh, but wait, the guy who ACTUALLY committed the murder DID get out of dodge! It's been pointed out many times, to many people, but despite that, they still can't accept that Amanda didn't kill her friend. In my research of such topics, I've noted that the majority of murders that are planned and premeditated, are usually (certainly not always, look at OJ) meticulously planned and carried out. As we all know, Meredith's murder was messy, indicating a crime of opportunity, as has been pointed out by others. Additionally, if Amanda TRULY wanted to kill her roommate and demonstrated either psychopathy or sociopathy (as she has often been accused of), would she have not picked a far better time or method, and even planned it better? Not to mention, most people who commit crimes often don't care if people think they're guilty or not. IF Amanda was truly the "cold, psychopathic, evil and psychotic bitch" these people want to believe she is, she would not have stuck around, she would not speak kindly about BOTH Meredith AND the Kerchers, and she surely wouldn't keep speaking out. Those who kill without remorse, as they often accuse Amanda of doing, don't care about the lives that are destroyed in the process, and it's been well documented that such people can't FAKE empathy and care. If Amanda were truly that kind of person, she would have left without even second glance back, and she certainly wouldn't have returned to the crime scene. That, or again, she would have planned it so much better so as not to draw ANY attention to herself, because as we have seen in countless infamous cases, that's how those types operate. They're not sloppy, or random. And if Amanda were such a person, it is highly likely that by this time, she would have killed again. But obviously, there is no telling any of this to those who continue to believe the fallacy of Amanda's guilt or to try to get them to understand and connect the dots. I know I'm "preaching to the choir" so-to-speak, and you folks have probably gone 'round and 'round until you're blue in the face on all of this, and I've come late to the "party". I've never, ever met Amanda, I know nothing more about her other than what I have read, so I don't really KNOW who the REAL Amanada is, if you understand what I'm saying (which is what pisses me off about these guilters, because they obviously KNOW her so well), and yet, I see these people making these impossible leaps of logic and railroading this young woman, and I can't get my head wrapped around that. I'm sure all of you feel the same way. And it's unfortunate that SOUND logic, reasoning and common-sense will never find their way into the Italian court system.

So once again, my hat's off to you folks. I know I do not ever want to see Amanda extradited or spend another minute in an Italian jail, nor do I want to see Mr. Sollecito spend any more time in prison. I wish they would have spirited him out of the country and away from the lynch-mob that is the Italian justice system, but I suppose that's easier said than done. I'm not sure what, if anything, I can do to make a difference either. In spite of the extradition treaty, I truly hope that those in our government will closely examine the REAL facts in this case, deny extradition based on those facts, and then somehow use their political clout to demonstrate this gross miscarriage of justice and demand that the case be appealed to a court OUTSIDE of Italy that will finally and fairly, really look at the evidence ALL of the evidence and render a verdict BASED on that evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. I don't know if that's possible, but I hope it is. Thanks for letting me post. Sorry this is so long, but I've needed to vent some of this for a LONG time now. (And if my profanity is a "no-no", feel free to edit it out).
AmandaIsInnocent
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2014 12:40 pm

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby ClintNine » Sat Feb 01, 2014 11:47 am

To AmandaisInnocent: Read this: http://www.murderofmeredithkercher.com
tweet it, share it.
ClintNine
 
Posts: 556
Joined: Fri Nov 16, 2012 1:31 pm

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby kindlekitten » Sat Feb 01, 2014 12:39 pm

You know, I just joined today and this is only my second post. I read this and I'm actually kind of speechless, which doesn't happen often.

Jesus f***ing Christ, who are these people??!! This is bordering on worship, and it's awfully, awfully, awfully creepy and quite disturbing!

I have been following Amanda's case for several years now, and the one thing that has and continues to shock me is the despicable and abject hatred that these guilters have for her. It is as if they want to do everything they can to destroy her, short of killing her. I would like to ask the family of Meredith Kercher why this is acceptable to them, and how does this in any way honor the memory of their loved one?

And if I didn't know any better, it seems to me these guilters, these useless excuses for human beings, have all-but elevated Ms. Kercher to sainthood. I'm sure she was a nice person, and she certainly didn't deserve what happened to her, but Jesus f***ing Christ! The way these people talk about her, you'd think she must have sh*t golden turds or something, while Amanda may just as well be indwelt by Satan himself! You guys who run this site, my hat's off to you. (If there was a hat-tipping avatar, I'd put it here). You obviously have far more grace and patience than I would have, because I have an incredibly difficult time dealing with moronic idiots. And trust me, there's much worse I want to call them.

You know what else I have often wondered? What if things were reversed? What if it had been AMANDA who had been murdered that night, and suspicion was thrust upon Meredith? These guilters who continue to assassinate Amanda's character and say the most vile and wretched things about her, often excuse their vitriol by pointing out how Amanda is deserving of it because she "got a ticket because a party was too loud", or she "staged a break-in", or had "multiple sex partners" and smoked weed, so all of these things "obviously demonstrate she is a vile murderess!". WTF!?? So I wonder what we would find if the tables were turned and we dug into Meredith Kercher's past? According to what I've read, Meredith also liked to party and she liked to smoke a little weed now and then. Did she engage in sex at any time in her life? Probably. Did she ever pull any pranks on her friends? Likely. IF the tables were turned, would anyone conclude that any of those things point to or lead to her potentially being a killer? I have never, never, ever understood how it is that these people make such wild leaps of logic, it is beyond reason to me. If the tables were turned, it would certainly be ridiculous to come to such conclusions, yet they have done and continue to do just that in Amanda's case, and not just these pathetic losers, but the Italian police, 2 separate courts, and that low-life piece of crap, Mignini. And would they say the same vile and reprehensible things about Ms. Kercher, if situation were reversed, that they have said about Amanda? Or would they just chalk it up to "another arrogant, over-privileged American is dead, so what?" The other thing that has never made sense to me is all of the "wailing and gnashing of teeth" and the incredible sensationalism that this has turned into, kept at the forefront by the guilters. I mean, tragically, people are murdered every day around the world, but the cases that end up becoming what we think of as "high profile", either involve celebrity or multiple deaths or children or incredibly bizarre circumstances, among other things. In the grand scheme of things, if you want to boil it down to basics, who were Amanda Knox and Meredith Kercher? 2 college students studying in Italy, essentially, "nobodies", no different than most of us. But then Meredith is brutally murdered by some looser, and the local prosecutor turns his sights on Amanda merely because of how she looked? Amanda, who stayed at the crime scene and did everything she could to cooperate with the local authorities, which by the way is what we're taught here in America, and it's what innocent people do. So then Mignini, (even after the real murderer is caught), engages in this incredible campaign of character assassination and innuendo and misinformation, and as that information is disseminated and distributed, from there this whole cottage industry arises of people who decide that they absolutely hate this woman, (whom they've never met), decide she is evil incarnate because of the lies of a public official, and continue to stop at nothing to destroy her. I'd even go so far to say that if they were given the opportunity, given some of the hatred and vitriol that just oozes from their comments, they would execute Amanda and stand in line for the chance to "pull the lever". I wonder if Peter Quennell and his cronies realize that they're no better than most criminals. I mean, if you're not willing to listen to reason and all you want is blood, then what does that make you?

I'm sorry everyone, I realize this is not the best post for a 2nd one. But I have to tell you, I am fit to be tied, and I am just damned tired of all the people who refuse to see the evidence, who refuse to look at the data and listen to voices of reason like Steve Moore and Ron Hendry and so many others. Who refuse to recognize or believe that Amanda's rights were violated during her interrogation, that they used interrogation techniques that the American military has been criticized for when dealing with prisoners, and that there is no RIGHT or WRONG way to "act" in the face of the death of someone you've cared about. You know, that has always lead me to another question that I have NEVER seen even one guilter answer: If Amanda WAS really guilty, why the hell didn't she get the f**k out of dodge? Why stick around? Of course they'll say, "to try and make them think she's innocent", and that's a bunch of crap. I know reasoning and logic are difficult for them, but who, in their right mind, chooses to stick around after they've murdered someone AND not only that, but return to the scene of said murder? Especially a murder as sloppy as Meredith's was? Oh, but wait, the guy who ACTUALLY committed the murder DID get out of dodge! It's been pointed out many times, to many people, but despite that, they still can't accept that Amanda didn't kill her friend. In my research of such topics, I've noted that the majority of murders that are planned and premeditated, are usually (certainly not always, look at OJ) meticulously planned and carried out. As we all know, Meredith's murder was messy, indicating a crime of opportunity, as has been pointed out by others. Additionally, if Amanda TRULY wanted to kill her roommate and demonstrated either psychopathy or sociopathy (as she has often been accused of), would she have not picked a far better time or method, and even planned it better? Not to mention, most people who commit crimes often don't care if people think they're guilty or not. IF Amanda was truly the "cold, psychopathic, evil and psychotic bitch" these people want to believe she is, she would not have stuck around, she would not speak kindly about BOTH Meredith AND the Kerchers, and she surely wouldn't keep speaking out. Those who kill without remorse, as they often accuse Amanda of doing, don't care about the lives that are destroyed in the process, and it's been well documented that such people can't FAKE empathy and care. If Amanda were truly that kind of person, she would have left without even second glance back, and she certainly wouldn't have returned to the crime scene. That, or again, she would have planned it so much better so as not to draw ANY attention to herself, because as we have seen in countless infamous cases, that's how those types operate. They're not sloppy, or random. And if Amanda were such a person, it is highly likely that by this time, she would have killed again. But obviously, there is no telling any of this to those who continue to believe the fallacy of Amanda's guilt or to try to get them to understand and connect the dots. I know I'm "preaching to the choir" so-to-speak, and you folks have probably gone 'round and 'round until you're blue in the face on all of this, and I've come late to the "party". I've never, ever met Amanda, I know nothing more about her other than what I have read, so I don't really KNOW who the REAL Amanada is, if you understand what I'm saying (which is what pisses me off about these guilters, because they obviously KNOW her so well), and yet, I see these people making these impossible leaps of logic and railroading this young woman, and I can't get my head wrapped around that. I'm sure all of you feel the same way. And it's unfortunate that SOUND logic, reasoning and common-sense will never find their way into the Italian court system.

So once again, my hat's off to you folks. I know I do not ever want to see Amanda extradited or spend another minute in an Italian jail, nor do I want to see Mr. Sollecito spend any more time in prison. I wish they would have spirited him out of the country and away from the lynch-mob that is the Italian justice system, but I suppose that's easier said than done. I'm not sure what, if anything, I can do to make a difference either. In spite of the extradition treaty, I truly hope that those in our government will closely examine the REAL facts in this case, deny extradition based on those facts, and then somehow use their political clout to demonstrate this gross miscarriage of justice and demand that the case be appealed to a court OUTSIDE of Italy that will finally and fairly, really look at the evidence ALL of the evidence and render a verdict BASED on that evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. I don't know if that's possible, but I hope it is. Thanks for letting me post. Sorry this is so long, but I've needed to vent some of this for a LONG time now. (And if my profanity is a "no-no", feel free to edit it out).[/quote]

welcome, and welcome to the club :boggled:
kindlekitten
 
Posts: 519
Joined: Wed Dec 15, 2010 10:04 am
Location: the Olympic Peninsula of Washington State

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby AmandaIsInnocent » Sat Feb 01, 2014 1:43 pm

kindlekitten wrote:You know, I just joined today and this is only my second post. I read this and I'm actually kind of speechless, which doesn't happen often.

Jesus f***ing Christ, who are these people??!! This is bordering on worship, and it's awfully, awfully, awfully creepy and quite disturbing!

I have been following Amanda's case for several years now, and the one thing that has and continues to shock me is the despicable and abject hatred that these guilters have for her. It is as if they want to do everything they can to destroy her, short of killing her. I would like to ask the family of Meredith Kercher why this is acceptable to them, and how does this in any way honor the memory of their loved one?

And if I didn't know any better, it seems to me these guilters, these useless excuses for human beings, have all-but elevated Ms. Kercher to sainthood. I'm sure she was a nice person, and she certainly didn't deserve what happened to her, but Jesus f***ing Christ! The way these people talk about her, you'd think she must have sh*t golden turds or something, while Amanda may just as well be indwelt by Satan himself! You guys who run this site, my hat's off to you. (If there was a hat-tipping avatar, I'd put it here). You obviously have far more grace and patience than I would have, because I have an incredibly difficult time dealing with moronic idiots. And trust me, there's much worse I want to call them.

You know what else I have often wondered? What if things were reversed? What if it had been AMANDA who had been murdered that night, and suspicion was thrust upon Meredith? These guilters who continue to assassinate Amanda's character and say the most vile and wretched things about her, often excuse their vitriol by pointing out how Amanda is deserving of it because she "got a ticket because a party was too loud", or she "staged a break-in", or had "multiple sex partners" and smoked weed, so all of these things "obviously demonstrate she is a vile murderess!". WTF!?? So I wonder what we would find if the tables were turned and we dug into Meredith Kercher's past? According to what I've read, Meredith also liked to party and she liked to smoke a little weed now and then. Did she engage in sex at any time in her life? Probably. Did she ever pull any pranks on her friends? Likely. IF the tables were turned, would anyone conclude that any of those things point to or lead to her potentially being a killer? I have never, never, ever understood how it is that these people make such wild leaps of logic, it is beyond reason to me. If the tables were turned, it would certainly be ridiculous to come to such conclusions, yet they have done and continue to do just that in Amanda's case, and not just these pathetic losers, but the Italian police, 2 separate courts, and that low-life piece of crap, Mignini. And would they say the same vile and reprehensible things about Ms. Kercher, if situation were reversed, that they have said about Amanda? Or would they just chalk it up to "another arrogant, over-privileged American is dead, so what?" The other thing that has never made sense to me is all of the "wailing and gnashing of teeth" and the incredible sensationalism that this has turned into, kept at the forefront by the guilters. I mean, tragically, people are murdered every day around the world, but the cases that end up becoming what we think of as "high profile", either involve celebrity or multiple deaths or children or incredibly bizarre circumstances, among other things. In the grand scheme of things, if you want to boil it down to basics, who were Amanda Knox and Meredith Kercher? 2 college students studying in Italy, essentially, "nobodies", no different than most of us. But then Meredith is brutally murdered by some looser, and the local prosecutor turns his sights on Amanda merely because of how she looked? Amanda, who stayed at the crime scene and did everything she could to cooperate with the local authorities, which by the way is what we're taught here in America, and it's what innocent people do. So then Mignini, (even after the real murderer is caught), engages in this incredible campaign of character assassination and innuendo and misinformation, and as that information is disseminated and distributed, from there this whole cottage industry arises of people who decide that they absolutely hate this woman, (whom they've never met), decide she is evil incarnate because of the lies of a public official, and continue to stop at nothing to destroy her. I'd even go so far to say that if they were given the opportunity, given some of the hatred and vitriol that just oozes from their comments, they would execute Amanda and stand in line for the chance to "pull the lever". I wonder if Peter Quennell and his cronies realize that they're no better than most criminals. I mean, if you're not willing to listen to reason and all you want is blood, then what does that make you?

I'm sorry everyone, I realize this is not the best post for a 2nd one. But I have to tell you, I am fit to be tied, and I am just damned tired of all the people who refuse to see the evidence, who refuse to look at the data and listen to voices of reason like Steve Moore and Ron Hendry and so many others. Who refuse to recognize or believe that Amanda's rights were violated during her interrogation, that they used interrogation techniques that the American military has been criticized for when dealing with prisoners, and that there is no RIGHT or WRONG way to "act" in the face of the death of someone you've cared about. You know, that has always lead me to another question that I have NEVER seen even one guilter answer: If Amanda WAS really guilty, why the hell didn't she get the f**k out of dodge? Why stick around? Of course they'll say, "to try and make them think she's innocent", and that's a bunch of crap. I know reasoning and logic are difficult for them, but who, in their right mind, chooses to stick around after they've murdered someone AND not only that, but return to the scene of said murder? Especially a murder as sloppy as Meredith's was? Oh, but wait, the guy who ACTUALLY committed the murder DID get out of dodge! It's been pointed out many times, to many people, but despite that, they still can't accept that Amanda didn't kill her friend. In my research of such topics, I've noted that the majority of murders that are planned and premeditated, are usually (certainly not always, look at OJ) meticulously planned and carried out. As we all know, Meredith's murder was messy, indicating a crime of opportunity, as has been pointed out by others. Additionally, if Amanda TRULY wanted to kill her roommate and demonstrated either psychopathy or sociopathy (as she has often been accused of), would she have not picked a far better time or method, and even planned it better? Not to mention, most people who commit crimes often don't care if people think they're guilty or not. IF Amanda was truly the "cold, psychopathic, evil and psychotic bitch" these people want to believe she is, she would not have stuck around, she would not speak kindly about BOTH Meredith AND the Kerchers, and she surely wouldn't keep speaking out. Those who kill without remorse, as they often accuse Amanda of doing, don't care about the lives that are destroyed in the process, and it's been well documented that such people can't FAKE empathy and care. If Amanda were truly that kind of person, she would have left without even second glance back, and she certainly wouldn't have returned to the crime scene. That, or again, she would have planned it so much better so as not to draw ANY attention to herself, because as we have seen in countless infamous cases, that's how those types operate. They're not sloppy, or random. And if Amanda were such a person, it is highly likely that by this time, she would have killed again. But obviously, there is no telling any of this to those who continue to believe the fallacy of Amanda's guilt or to try to get them to understand and connect the dots. I know I'm "preaching to the choir" so-to-speak, and you folks have probably gone 'round and 'round until you're blue in the face on all of this, and I've come late to the "party". I've never, ever met Amanda, I know nothing more about her other than what I have read, so I don't really KNOW who the REAL Amanada is, if you understand what I'm saying (which is what pisses me off about these guilters, because they obviously KNOW her so well), and yet, I see these people making these impossible leaps of logic and railroading this young woman, and I can't get my head wrapped around that. I'm sure all of you feel the same way. And it's unfortunate that SOUND logic, reasoning and common-sense will never find their way into the Italian court system.

So once again, my hat's off to you folks. I know I do not ever want to see Amanda extradited or spend another minute in an Italian jail, nor do I want to see Mr. Sollecito spend any more time in prison. I wish they would have spirited him out of the country and away from the lynch-mob that is the Italian justice system, but I suppose that's easier said than done. I'm not sure what, if anything, I can do to make a difference either. In spite of the extradition treaty, I truly hope that those in our government will closely examine the REAL facts in this case, deny extradition based on those facts, and then somehow use their political clout to demonstrate this gross miscarriage of justice and demand that the case be appealed to a court OUTSIDE of Italy that will finally and fairly, really look at the evidence ALL of the evidence and render a verdict BASED on that evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. I don't know if that's possible, but I hope it is. Thanks for letting me post. Sorry this is so long, but I've needed to vent some of this for a LONG time now. (And if my profanity is a "no-no", feel free to edit it out).


welcome, and welcome to the club :boggled:[/quote]


Thank you!
AmandaIsInnocent
 
Posts: 12
Joined: Fri Jan 31, 2014 12:40 pm

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby ScifiTom » Sun Feb 02, 2014 8:29 am

AmandaIsInnocent wrote:
You know, I just joined today and this is only my second post. I read this and I'm actually kind of speechless, which doesn't happen often.

Jesus f***ing Christ, who are these people??!! This is bordering on worship, and it's awfully, awfully, awfully creepy and quite disturbing!

I have been following Amanda's case for several years now, and the one thing that has and continues to shock me is the despicable and abject hatred that these guilters have for her. It is as if they want to do everything they can to destroy her, short of killing her. I would like to ask the family of Meredith Kercher why this is acceptable to them, and how does this in any way honor the memory of their loved one?

And if I didn't know any better, it seems to me these guilters, these useless excuses for human beings, have all-but elevated Ms. Kercher to sainthood. I'm sure she was a nice person, and she certainly didn't deserve what happened to her, but Jesus f***ing Christ! The way these people talk about her, you'd think she must have sh*t golden turds or something, while Amanda may just as well be indwelt by Satan himself! You guys who run this site, my hat's off to you. (If there was a hat-tipping avatar, I'd put it here). You obviously have far more grace and patience than I would have, because I have an incredibly difficult time dealing with moronic idiots. And trust me, there's much worse I want to call them.

You know what else I have often wondered? What if things were reversed? What if it had been AMANDA who had been murdered that night, and suspicion was thrust upon Meredith? These guilters who continue to assassinate Amanda's character and say the most vile and wretched things about her, often excuse their vitriol by pointing out how Amanda is deserving of it because she "got a ticket because a party was too loud", or she "staged a break-in", or had "multiple sex partners" and smoked weed, so all of these things "obviously demonstrate she is a vile murderess!". WTF!?? So I wonder what we would find if the tables were turned and we dug into Meredith Kercher's past? According to what I've read, Meredith also liked to party and she liked to smoke a little weed now and then. Did she engage in sex at any time in her life? Probably. Did she ever pull any pranks on her friends? Likely. IF the tables were turned, would anyone conclude that any of those things point to or lead to her potentially being a killer? I have never, never, ever understood how it is that these people make such wild leaps of logic, it is beyond reason to me. If the tables were turned, it would certainly be ridiculous to come to such conclusions, yet they have done and continue to do just that in Amanda's case, and not just these pathetic losers, but the Italian police, 2 separate courts, and that low-life piece of crap, Mignini. And would they say the same vile and reprehensible things about Ms. Kercher, if situation were reversed, that they have said about Amanda? Or would they just chalk it up to "another arrogant, over-privileged American is dead, so what?" The other thing that has never made sense to me is all of the "wailing and gnashing of teeth" and the incredible sensationalism that this has turned into, kept at the forefront by the guilters. I mean, tragically, people are murdered every day around the world, but the cases that end up becoming what we think of as "high profile", either involve celebrity or multiple deaths or children or incredibly bizarre circumstances, among other things. In the grand scheme of things, if you want to boil it down to basics, who were Amanda Knox and Meredith Kercher? 2 college students studying in Italy, essentially, "nobodies", no different than most of us. But then Meredith is brutally murdered by some looser, and the local prosecutor turns his sights on Amanda merely because of how she looked? Amanda, who stayed at the crime scene and did everything she could to cooperate with the local authorities, which by the way is what we're taught here in America, and it's what innocent people do. So then Mignini, (even after the real murderer is caught), engages in this incredible campaign of character assassination and innuendo and misinformation, and as that information is disseminated and distributed, from there this whole cottage industry arises of people who decide that they absolutely hate this woman, (whom they've never met), decide she is evil incarnate because of the lies of a public official, and continue to stop at nothing to destroy her. I'd even go so far to say that if they were given the opportunity, given some of the hatred and vitriol that just oozes from their comments, they would execute Amanda and stand in line for the chance to "pull the lever". I wonder if Peter Quennell and his cronies realize that they're no better than most criminals. I mean, if you're not willing to listen to reason and all you want is blood, then what does that make you?

I'm sorry everyone, I realize this is not the best post for a 2nd one. But I have to tell you, I am fit to be tied, and I am just damned tired of all the people who refuse to see the evidence, who refuse to look at the data and listen to voices of reason like Steve Moore and Ron Hendry and so many others. Who refuse to recognize or believe that Amanda's rights were violated during her interrogation, that they used interrogation techniques that the American military has been criticized for when dealing with prisoners, and that there is no RIGHT or WRONG way to "act" in the face of the death of someone you've cared about. You know, that has always lead me to another question that I have NEVER seen even one guilter answer: If Amanda WAS really guilty, why the hell didn't she get the f**k out of dodge? Why stick around? Of course they'll say, "to try and make them think she's innocent", and that's a bunch of crap. I know reasoning and logic are difficult for them, but who, in their right mind, chooses to stick around after they've murdered someone AND not only that, but return to the scene of said murder? Especially a murder as sloppy as Meredith's was? Oh, but wait, the guy who ACTUALLY committed the murder DID get out of dodge! It's been pointed out many times, to many people, but despite that, they still can't accept that Amanda didn't kill her friend. In my research of such topics, I've noted that the majority of murders that are planned and premeditated, are usually (certainly not always, look at OJ) meticulously planned and carried out. As we all know, Meredith's murder was messy, indicating a crime of opportunity, as has been pointed out by others. Additionally, if Amanda TRULY wanted to kill her roommate and demonstrated either psychopathy or sociopathy (as she has often been accused of), would she have not picked a far better time or method, and even planned it better? Not to mention, most people who commit crimes often don't care if people think they're guilty or not. IF Amanda was truly the "cold, psychopathic, evil and psychotic bitch" these people want to believe she is, she would not have stuck around, she would not speak kindly about BOTH Meredith AND the Kerchers, and she surely wouldn't keep speaking out. Those who kill without remorse, as they often accuse Amanda of doing, don't care about the lives that are destroyed in the process, and it's been well documented that such people can't FAKE empathy and care. If Amanda were truly that kind of person, she would have left without even second glance back, and she certainly wouldn't have returned to the crime scene. That, or again, she would have planned it so much better so as not to draw ANY attention to herself, because as we have seen in countless infamous cases, that's how those types operate. They're not sloppy, or random. And if Amanda were such a person, it is highly likely that by this time, she would have killed again. But obviously, there is no telling any of this to those who continue to believe the fallacy of Amanda's guilt or to try to get them to understand and connect the dots. I know I'm "preaching to the choir" so-to-speak, and you folks have probably gone 'round and 'round until you're blue in the face on all of this, and I've come late to the "party". I've never, ever met Amanda, I know nothing more about her other than what I have read, so I don't really KNOW who the REAL Amanada is, if you understand what I'm saying (which is what pisses me off about these guilters, because they obviously KNOW her so well), and yet, I see these people making these impossible leaps of logic and railroading this young woman, and I can't get my head wrapped around that. I'm sure all of you feel the same way. And it's unfortunate that SOUND logic, reasoning and common-sense will never find their way into the Italian court system.

So once again, my hat's off to you folks. I know I do not ever want to see Amanda extradited or spend another minute in an Italian jail, nor do I want to see Mr. Sollecito spend any more time in prison. I wish they would have spirited him out of the country and away from the lynch-mob that is the Italian justice system, but I suppose that's easier said than done. I'm not sure what, if anything, I can do to make a difference either. In spite of the extradition treaty, I truly hope that those in our government will closely examine the REAL facts in this case, deny extradition based on those facts, and then somehow use their political clout to demonstrate this gross miscarriage of justice and demand that the case be appealed to a court OUTSIDE of Italy that will finally and fairly, really look at the evidence ALL of the evidence and render a verdict BASED on that evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. I don't know if that's possible, but I hope it is. Thanks for letting me post. Sorry this is so long, but I've needed to vent some of this for a LONG time now. (And if my profanity is a "no-no", feel free to edit it out).


To Amanda Innocent

Hey Amanda Innocent welcome to the forum even you will be surpise even you think TJMK is worst, wait until you see PMF forum they post so badly that it goes more worst then ever. It not a pretty site at all. They have no love. The only thing into that website is hate of them hating their self, even they don't know criminal law, or they hate to read a novel or they hate book stores. I truly love it, even they don't understand anything at all, and why is it that they want to put books on fire to burn them, even a good book is good to read!!!

In more words I don't like Wayne Lapiere who said: A good guy with a good gun. I disgree of what he said, and even I say a good book is something good to read, even it not going to kill them. I truly love it, and enjoy posting in here and have a fun time posting away and talk to you soon Amanda Innocent!!!
TMJ

Anne Hathaway number 1 fan

Free the Innocence 2

Free: Kirstin Lobato Las Vegas NV & Dusty Turner Norfolk VA
User avatar
ScifiTom
 
Posts: 4707
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:58 am
Location: Norfolk Va

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby KayPea » Sun Feb 02, 2014 8:18 pm

ScifiTom wrote:
AmandaIsInnocent wrote:
You know, I just joined today and this is only my second post. I read this and I'm actually kind of speechless, which doesn't happen often.

Jesus f***ing Christ, who are these people??!! This is bordering on worship, and it's awfully, awfully, awfully creepy and quite disturbing!

I have been following Amanda's case for several years now, and the one thing that has and continues to shock me is the despicable and abject hatred that these guilters have for her. It is as if they want to do everything they can to destroy her, short of killing her. I would like to ask the family of Meredith Kercher why this is acceptable to them, and how does this in any way honor the memory of their loved one?

And if I didn't know any better, it seems to me these guilters, these useless excuses for human beings, have all-but elevated Ms. Kercher to sainthood. I'm sure she was a nice person, and she certainly didn't deserve what happened to her, but Jesus f***ing Christ! The way these people talk about her, you'd think she must have sh*t golden turds or something, while Amanda may just as well be indwelt by Satan himself! You guys who run this site, my hat's off to you. (If there was a hat-tipping avatar, I'd put it here). You obviously have far more grace and patience than I would have, because I have an incredibly difficult time dealing with moronic idiots. And trust me, there's much worse I want to call them.

You know what else I have often wondered? What if things were reversed? What if it had been AMANDA who had been murdered that night, and suspicion was thrust upon Meredith? These guilters who continue to assassinate Amanda's character and say the most vile and wretched things about her, often excuse their vitriol by pointing out how Amanda is deserving of it because she "got a ticket because a party was too loud", or she "staged a break-in", or had "multiple sex partners" and smoked weed, so all of these things "obviously demonstrate she is a vile murderess!". WTF!?? So I wonder what we would find if the tables were turned and we dug into Meredith Kercher's past? According to what I've read, Meredith also liked to party and she liked to smoke a little weed now and then. Did she engage in sex at any time in her life? Probably. Did she ever pull any pranks on her friends? Likely. IF the tables were turned, would anyone conclude that any of those things point to or lead to her potentially being a killer? I have never, never, ever understood how it is that these people make such wild leaps of logic, it is beyond reason to me. If the tables were turned, it would certainly be ridiculous to come to such conclusions, yet they have done and continue to do just that in Amanda's case, and not just these pathetic losers, but the Italian police, 2 separate courts, and that low-life piece of crap, Mignini. And would they say the same vile and reprehensible things about Ms. Kercher, if situation were reversed, that they have said about Amanda? Or would they just chalk it up to "another arrogant, over-privileged American is dead, so what?" The other thing that has never made sense to me is all of the "wailing and gnashing of teeth" and the incredible sensationalism that this has turned into, kept at the forefront by the guilters. I mean, tragically, people are murdered every day around the world, but the cases that end up becoming what we think of as "high profile", either involve celebrity or multiple deaths or children or incredibly bizarre circumstances, among other things. In the grand scheme of things, if you want to boil it down to basics, who were Amanda Knox and Meredith Kercher? 2 college students studying in Italy, essentially, "nobodies", no different than most of us. But then Meredith is brutally murdered by some looser, and the local prosecutor turns his sights on Amanda merely because of how she looked? Amanda, who stayed at the crime scene and did everything she could to cooperate with the local authorities, which by the way is what we're taught here in America, and it's what innocent people do. So then Mignini, (even after the real murderer is caught), engages in this incredible campaign of character assassination and innuendo and misinformation, and as that information is disseminated and distributed, from there this whole cottage industry arises of people who decide that they absolutely hate this woman, (whom they've never met), decide she is evil incarnate because of the lies of a public official, and continue to stop at nothing to destroy her. I'd even go so far to say that if they were given the opportunity, given some of the hatred and vitriol that just oozes from their comments, they would execute Amanda and stand in line for the chance to "pull the lever". I wonder if Peter Quennell and his cronies realize that they're no better than most criminals. I mean, if you're not willing to listen to reason and all you want is blood, then what does that make you?

I'm sorry everyone, I realize this is not the best post for a 2nd one. But I have to tell you, I am fit to be tied, and I am just damned tired of all the people who refuse to see the evidence, who refuse to look at the data and listen to voices of reason like Steve Moore and Ron Hendry and so many others. Who refuse to recognize or believe that Amanda's rights were violated during her interrogation, that they used interrogation techniques that the American military has been criticized for when dealing with prisoners, and that there is no RIGHT or WRONG way to "act" in the face of the death of someone you've cared about. You know, that has always lead me to another question that I have NEVER seen even one guilter answer: If Amanda WAS really guilty, why the hell didn't she get the f**k out of dodge? Why stick around? Of course they'll say, "to try and make them think she's innocent", and that's a bunch of crap. I know reasoning and logic are difficult for them, but who, in their right mind, chooses to stick around after they've murdered someone AND not only that, but return to the scene of said murder? Especially a murder as sloppy as Meredith's was? Oh, but wait, the guy who ACTUALLY committed the murder DID get out of dodge! It's been pointed out many times, to many people, but despite that, they still can't accept that Amanda didn't kill her friend. In my research of such topics, I've noted that the majority of murders that are planned and premeditated, are usually (certainly not always, look at OJ) meticulously planned and carried out. As we all know, Meredith's murder was messy, indicating a crime of opportunity, as has been pointed out by others. Additionally, if Amanda TRULY wanted to kill her roommate and demonstrated either psychopathy or sociopathy (as she has often been accused of), would she have not picked a far better time or method, and even planned it better? Not to mention, most people who commit crimes often don't care if people think they're guilty or not. IF Amanda was truly the "cold, psychopathic, evil and psychotic bitch" these people want to believe she is, she would not have stuck around, she would not speak kindly about BOTH Meredith AND the Kerchers, and she surely wouldn't keep speaking out. Those who kill without remorse, as they often accuse Amanda of doing, don't care about the lives that are destroyed in the process, and it's been well documented that such people can't FAKE empathy and care. If Amanda were truly that kind of person, she would have left without even second glance back, and she certainly wouldn't have returned to the crime scene. That, or again, she would have planned it so much better so as not to draw ANY attention to herself, because as we have seen in countless infamous cases, that's how those types operate. They're not sloppy, or random. And if Amanda were such a person, it is highly likely that by this time, she would have killed again. But obviously, there is no telling any of this to those who continue to believe the fallacy of Amanda's guilt or to try to get them to understand and connect the dots. I know I'm "preaching to the choir" so-to-speak, and you folks have probably gone 'round and 'round until you're blue in the face on all of this, and I've come late to the "party". I've never, ever met Amanda, I know nothing more about her other than what I have read, so I don't really KNOW who the REAL Amanada is, if you understand what I'm saying (which is what pisses me off about these guilters, because they obviously KNOW her so well), and yet, I see these people making these impossible leaps of logic and railroading this young woman, and I can't get my head wrapped around that. I'm sure all of you feel the same way. And it's unfortunate that SOUND logic, reasoning and common-sense will never find their way into the Italian court system.

So once again, my hat's off to you folks. I know I do not ever want to see Amanda extradited or spend another minute in an Italian jail, nor do I want to see Mr. Sollecito spend any more time in prison. I wish they would have spirited him out of the country and away from the lynch-mob that is the Italian justice system, but I suppose that's easier said than done. I'm not sure what, if anything, I can do to make a difference either. In spite of the extradition treaty, I truly hope that those in our government will closely examine the REAL facts in this case, deny extradition based on those facts, and then somehow use their political clout to demonstrate this gross miscarriage of justice and demand that the case be appealed to a court OUTSIDE of Italy that will finally and fairly, really look at the evidence ALL of the evidence and render a verdict BASED on that evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. I don't know if that's possible, but I hope it is. Thanks for letting me post. Sorry this is so long, but I've needed to vent some of this for a LONG time now. (And if my profanity is a "no-no", feel free to edit it out).


To Amanda Innocent

Hey Amanda Innocent welcome to the forum even you will be surpise even you think TJMK is worst, wait until you see PMF forum they post so badly that it goes more worst then ever. It not a pretty site at all. They have no love. The only thing into that website is hate of them hating their self, even they don't know criminal law, or they hate to read a novel or they hate book stores. I truly love it, even they don't understand anything at all, and why is it that they want to put books on fire to burn them, even a good book is good to read!!!

In more words I don't like Wayne Lapiere who said: A good guy with a good gun. I disgree of what he said, and even I say a good book is something good to read, even it not going to kill them. I truly love it, and enjoy posting in here and have a fun time posting away and talk to you soon Amanda Innocent!!!



WE FEEL YOUR PAIN
“If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it.”-- Marcus Aurelius
User avatar
KayPea
 
Posts: 3310
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 11:40 pm
Location: Seattle WA

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby ScifiTom » Sun Feb 02, 2014 9:55 pm

KayPea wrote:
ScifiTom wrote:
AmandaIsInnocent wrote:
You know, I just joined today and this is only my second post. I read this and I'm actually kind of speechless, which doesn't happen often.

Jesus f***ing Christ, who are these people??!! This is bordering on worship, and it's awfully, awfully, awfully creepy and quite disturbing!

I have been following Amanda's case for several years now, and the one thing that has and continues to shock me is the despicable and abject hatred that these guilters have for her. It is as if they want to do everything they can to destroy her, short of killing her. I would like to ask the family of Meredith Kercher why this is acceptable to them, and how does this in any way honor the memory of their loved one?

And if I didn't know any better, it seems to me these guilters, these useless excuses for human beings, have all-but elevated Ms. Kercher to sainthood. I'm sure she was a nice person, and she certainly didn't deserve what happened to her, but Jesus f***ing Christ! The way these people talk about her, you'd think she must have sh*t golden turds or something, while Amanda may just as well be indwelt by Satan himself! You guys who run this site, my hat's off to you. (If there was a hat-tipping avatar, I'd put it here). You obviously have far more grace and patience than I would have, because I have an incredibly difficult time dealing with moronic idiots. And trust me, there's much worse I want to call them.

You know what else I have often wondered? What if things were reversed? What if it had been AMANDA who had been murdered that night, and suspicion was thrust upon Meredith? These guilters who continue to assassinate Amanda's character and say the most vile and wretched things about her, often excuse their vitriol by pointing out how Amanda is deserving of it because she "got a ticket because a party was too loud", or she "staged a break-in", or had "multiple sex partners" and smoked weed, so all of these things "obviously demonstrate she is a vile murderess!". WTF!?? So I wonder what we would find if the tables were turned and we dug into Meredith Kercher's past? According to what I've read, Meredith also liked to party and she liked to smoke a little weed now and then. Did she engage in sex at any time in her life? Probably. Did she ever pull any pranks on her friends? Likely. IF the tables were turned, would anyone conclude that any of those things point to or lead to her potentially being a killer? I have never, never, ever understood how it is that these people make such wild leaps of logic, it is beyond reason to me. If the tables were turned, it would certainly be ridiculous to come to such conclusions, yet they have done and continue to do just that in Amanda's case, and not just these pathetic losers, but the Italian police, 2 separate courts, and that low-life piece of crap, Mignini. And would they say the same vile and reprehensible things about Ms. Kercher, if situation were reversed, that they have said about Amanda? Or would they just chalk it up to "another arrogant, over-privileged American is dead, so what?" The other thing that has never made sense to me is all of the "wailing and gnashing of teeth" and the incredible sensationalism that this has turned into, kept at the forefront by the guilters. I mean, tragically, people are murdered every day around the world, but the cases that end up becoming what we think of as "high profile", either involve celebrity or multiple deaths or children or incredibly bizarre circumstances, among other things. In the grand scheme of things, if you want to boil it down to basics, who were Amanda Knox and Meredith Kercher? 2 college students studying in Italy, essentially, "nobodies", no different than most of us. But then Meredith is brutally murdered by some looser, and the local prosecutor turns his sights on Amanda merely because of how she looked? Amanda, who stayed at the crime scene and did everything she could to cooperate with the local authorities, which by the way is what we're taught here in America, and it's what innocent people do. So then Mignini, (even after the real murderer is caught), engages in this incredible campaign of character assassination and innuendo and misinformation, and as that information is disseminated and distributed, from there this whole cottage industry arises of people who decide that they absolutely hate this woman, (whom they've never met), decide she is evil incarnate because of the lies of a public official, and continue to stop at nothing to destroy her. I'd even go so far to say that if they were given the opportunity, given some of the hatred and vitriol that just oozes from their comments, they would execute Amanda and stand in line for the chance to "pull the lever". I wonder if Peter Quennell and his cronies realize that they're no better than most criminals. I mean, if you're not willing to listen to reason and all you want is blood, then what does that make you?

I'm sorry everyone, I realize this is not the best post for a 2nd one. But I have to tell you, I am fit to be tied, and I am just damned tired of all the people who refuse to see the evidence, who refuse to look at the data and listen to voices of reason like Steve Moore and Ron Hendry and so many others. Who refuse to recognize or believe that Amanda's rights were violated during her interrogation, that they used interrogation techniques that the American military has been criticized for when dealing with prisoners, and that there is no RIGHT or WRONG way to "act" in the face of the death of someone you've cared about. You know, that has always lead me to another question that I have NEVER seen even one guilter answer: If Amanda WAS really guilty, why the hell didn't she get the f**k out of dodge? Why stick around? Of course they'll say, "to try and make them think she's innocent", and that's a bunch of crap. I know reasoning and logic are difficult for them, but who, in their right mind, chooses to stick around after they've murdered someone AND not only that, but return to the scene of said murder? Especially a murder as sloppy as Meredith's was? Oh, but wait, the guy who ACTUALLY committed the murder DID get out of dodge! It's been pointed out many times, to many people, but despite that, they still can't accept that Amanda didn't kill her friend. In my research of such topics, I've noted that the majority of murders that are planned and premeditated, are usually (certainly not always, look at OJ) meticulously planned and carried out. As we all know, Meredith's murder was messy, indicating a crime of opportunity, as has been pointed out by others. Additionally, if Amanda TRULY wanted to kill her roommate and demonstrated either psychopathy or sociopathy (as she has often been accused of), would she have not picked a far better time or method, and even planned it better? Not to mention, most people who commit crimes often don't care if people think they're guilty or not. IF Amanda was truly the "cold, psychopathic, evil and psychotic bitch" these people want to believe she is, she would not have stuck around, she would not speak kindly about BOTH Meredith AND the Kerchers, and she surely wouldn't keep speaking out. Those who kill without remorse, as they often accuse Amanda of doing, don't care about the lives that are destroyed in the process, and it's been well documented that such people can't FAKE empathy and care. If Amanda were truly that kind of person, she would have left without even second glance back, and she certainly wouldn't have returned to the crime scene. That, or again, she would have planned it so much better so as not to draw ANY attention to herself, because as we have seen in countless infamous cases, that's how those types operate. They're not sloppy, or random. And if Amanda were such a person, it is highly likely that by this time, she would have killed again. But obviously, there is no telling any of this to those who continue to believe the fallacy of Amanda's guilt or to try to get them to understand and connect the dots. I know I'm "preaching to the choir" so-to-speak, and you folks have probably gone 'round and 'round until you're blue in the face on all of this, and I've come late to the "party". I've never, ever met Amanda, I know nothing more about her other than what I have read, so I don't really KNOW who the REAL Amanada is, if you understand what I'm saying (which is what pisses me off about these guilters, because they obviously KNOW her so well), and yet, I see these people making these impossible leaps of logic and railroading this young woman, and I can't get my head wrapped around that. I'm sure all of you feel the same way. And it's unfortunate that SOUND logic, reasoning and common-sense will never find their way into the Italian court system.

So once again, my hat's off to you folks. I know I do not ever want to see Amanda extradited or spend another minute in an Italian jail, nor do I want to see Mr. Sollecito spend any more time in prison. I wish they would have spirited him out of the country and away from the lynch-mob that is the Italian justice system, but I suppose that's easier said than done. I'm not sure what, if anything, I can do to make a difference either. In spite of the extradition treaty, I truly hope that those in our government will closely examine the REAL facts in this case, deny extradition based on those facts, and then somehow use their political clout to demonstrate this gross miscarriage of justice and demand that the case be appealed to a court OUTSIDE of Italy that will finally and fairly, really look at the evidence ALL of the evidence and render a verdict BASED on that evidence beyond a reasonable doubt. I don't know if that's possible, but I hope it is. Thanks for letting me post. Sorry this is so long, but I've needed to vent some of this for a LONG time now. (And if my profanity is a "no-no", feel free to edit it out).


To Amanda Innocent

Hey Amanda Innocent welcome to the forum even you will be surpise even you think TJMK is worst, wait until you see PMF forum they post so badly that it goes more worst then ever. It not a pretty site at all. They have no love. The only thing into that website is hate of them hating their self, even they don't know criminal law, or they hate to read a novel or they hate book stores. I truly love it, even they don't understand anything at all, and why is it that they want to put books on fire to burn them, even a good book is good to read!!!

In more words I don't like Wayne Lapiere who said: A good guy with a good gun. I disgree of what he said, and even I say a good book is something good to read, even it not going to kill them. I truly love it, and enjoy posting in here and have a fun time posting away and talk to you soon Amanda Innocent!!!



WE FEEL YOUR PAIN


To Karen

Hey Karen, why are you Screaming, even why are you writing in capital letters? I only write nicely even I don't why you SCREAM? Course it pain even I just wish it goes away even I am not happy that Denver lost in the superbowl even Seattle won it, in the home state of Amanda Knox!!!
TMJ

Anne Hathaway number 1 fan

Free the Innocence 2

Free: Kirstin Lobato Las Vegas NV & Dusty Turner Norfolk VA
User avatar
ScifiTom
 
Posts: 4707
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:58 am
Location: Norfolk Va

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby Hans » Tue Feb 04, 2014 1:51 pm

I really should stop doing this, but the dilettantism of this one would have made me laugh if it weren't so sad: :((:
A picture and it's caption from one of the latest entries on TJMK:
Image
[Accurate Italian media recreation of attack based on masses of closed court evidence 2009]

Who do they think they're fooling?
"Accurate Italian media recreation", do they really think turning around the picture 180 degrees makes the "(c) Lifetime" in the upper right corner dissapear? True Justice for Meredith Kercher achieved by lying? :sadno:
He [Raffaele] is collateral damage in the unreasonable, irresponsible, and unrelenting scapegoating of the prosecution’s grotesque caricature that is “Foxy Knoxy”
~ Amanda Knox
Hans
 
Posts: 4544
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2011 8:41 pm
Location: Germany

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby Hans » Tue Feb 04, 2014 3:30 pm

Another "just for the record..."
Hopeful on 02/04/14 at 11:06 AM wrote:Nencini, welcome to Mignini’s Club. Membership is open to judges with immense integrity who are rewarded with bites and tusk slashes from rabid opponents. Mignini broke his head and heart for years over this miserable case, attacked on every side and slandered as a biased man. The pack went so far as to call him mentally unstable because he didn’t blind himself with the lame excuses of pro-Knox rabble rowsers. Yet Mignini finally came through the fire vindicated. He and the upstanding and courageous Nencini who has served justice for 30 years without a taint, can now both wear the blazer with gold insignia of the Mignini Club, “to the stars through adversity.” They are like the Leopard of refined Lampedusa family in Gattopardo. Their envious enemies the jackals, wolves and lynxes snarl around them in frothing fear and hatred to take them down but they can never change the valiant Leopard.

@Vivianna, ditto on all you said, and so very well stated. @James @Peter I agree, Nencini has been set up and in a moment of compassion fatigue he spoke in an effort to clarify and to defend Italian justice, but he underestimated the ferocity of the presspack and his enemies to twist words. Look at how they skewed everything Mignini tried to say.

Yes we wish Nencini had said nothing, to have issued a terse “no comment” and pushed through the ambush. Naturally the losing parties want to misconstrue his meanings, to find insinuations behind innocuous words. It’s their jaundiced eye and jaundiced agenda of the defense, Shameless in Seattle was a proper headline. Rafaelle’s lies about not knowing he could be cross-examined as if to blame an erudite judge for his own campaign of craven silence are an echo of his lies about not fleeing the border for Slovenia. He was ready to run at the first whiff of an arrest order.
He [Raffaele] is collateral damage in the unreasonable, irresponsible, and unrelenting scapegoating of the prosecution’s grotesque caricature that is “Foxy Knoxy”
~ Amanda Knox
Hans
 
Posts: 4544
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2011 8:41 pm
Location: Germany

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby ScifiTom » Fri Feb 07, 2014 5:21 pm

To everyone

Hey everyone, I just found out that we have an exposesion of some FREAKING CRAP CAR exploded. Are you really serious on this Peter Quennell. So that what he wrote into the TJMK!!!

Peter Quennell Wrote: 2/5/14 So What We May Expect

Judge Nencini is a seasoned mafia fighter, and he is also a seasoned fighter of politicians who are corrupt and try to bend the system their way. But his record is very clear. Attack him for murky end - and he does not exactly back down.

From the point of view of Sollecito’s prospects, this faux storm looks like another huge wrong move.


So Judge Nencini is a Mafia Fighter? Are we saying he really from IRAQ of Agfranstane of IRAQ company. No wonder America would BOMB Judge Nencini to killed, even your so DUMB of saying that Peter! My lord now Peter want to support IRAQ over Italy. I love it, even he makes no sense of what is he saying to the world of the world!!!

I might as well give up with this piece of crappy guy!!!
TMJ

Anne Hathaway number 1 fan

Free the Innocence 2

Free: Kirstin Lobato Las Vegas NV & Dusty Turner Norfolk VA
User avatar
ScifiTom
 
Posts: 4707
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:58 am
Location: Norfolk Va

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby Dougm » Fri Feb 07, 2014 6:22 pm

Hans wrote:I really should stop doing this, but the dilettantism of this one would have made me laugh if it weren't so sad: :((:
A picture and it's caption from one of the latest entries on TJMK:
Image
[Accurate Italian media recreation of attack based on masses of closed court evidence 2009]

Who do they think they're fooling?
"Accurate Italian media recreation", do they really think turning around the picture 180 degrees makes the "(c) Lifetime" in the upper right corner dissapear? True Justice for Meredith Kercher achieved by lying? :sadno:


Although the Lifetime movie was one of the most crass things that happened in this case (and that is saying a lot), this picture shows just how absurd the prosecution theory is. Even if they had shown an accurate representation of the size of the room, does this scenario look like anything that would ever happen?? Yet this is pretty much the way the murder has been envisioned by prosecutors from the beginning.

This also shows pretty accurately that there is no way that Amanda and Raff could have participated in the piercing of Meredith's throat without getting hit by blood spray. ::scotch::
When you berate someone and push them and confuse them and lie to them and convince them that they're wrong you're not finding the truth.

Amanda Knox
Dougm
Moderator
 
Posts: 3189
Joined: Sat Jan 01, 2011 5:00 pm

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby Hans » Tue Feb 11, 2014 3:31 pm

Ok, I said I wouldn't do it again, but this was posted on a site called "True Justice for Meredith Kercher"
Posted by Peter Quennell on 02/11/14 at 01:11 PM wrote: Tuesday, February 11, 2014
The Much-Demonized Rudy Guede Is Back In The News And Increasingly Threatening
Posted by Peter Quennell
Image

Rudy Guede has long DELIBERATELY been demonized so that the attack on Meredith can be assigned to him alone.

This description of Guede’s early days in the Ivory Coast and Perugia in the excellent Darkness Descending by Paul Russell and Graham Johnson remains the ONLY one that fully checks out. Certainly not that by the dishonest PR shill Nina Burleigh.

Guede wasn’t especially an angel, and some in Perugia were iffy about him. But he had real friends, and up north he held a real job with a real career future, until that prospect imploded and sent him haplessly back to Perugia.

Late in October 2008 Judge Micheli discounted all that Guede ever said about his role in the attack on Meredith in various conversations and statements, and sentenced Guede to 30 years.

But Judge Micheli also concluded that there was no firm evidence either that Guede acted alone or that Guede was a drifter, drug dealer, knife wielder or burglar (Micheli was very sharp with one witness who claimed Guede may - may - have broken into his house).

In 2009 through his lawyers Guede enquired of the prosecution whether he might testify at the Knox-Sollecito trial.

But the prosecutions’ hands were already tied by the indictments and they (rightly) believed they had a really strong case regardless of anything Guede could add.


At the 2009 trial the defenses pussyfooted around and never settled for a firm position on Guede. They floundered in their subdued attempts to prove that Guede or somebody else unknown was the so-called Lone Wolf.

The Lone Wolf theory is really a zombie theory with so many stakes through its heart that no court will ever take it seriously.

Guede’s steadfast fallback position before and since was that he was only in the house on the night of the attack because Meredith invited him to come in and they began love-making.

At his late-2009 first appeal and also at Sollecito’s and Knox’s 2011 appeal before Judge Hellmann, he increasingly firmly pointed the finger at Knox and Sollecito as the murderers.

Guede had been initially inclined to let sleeping dogs lie after he was mysteriously beaten up in the sex offenders wing of Viterbo prison, where prisoners are meant to be kept very safe.

But Judge Massei’s scenario of the attack on Meredith in his March 2010 Sentencing Report, with Rudy Guede as the lead instigator, really bothered him.

And in mid 2010 he became even more bothered when claims were made by a fellow prisoner the baby killer Mario Alessi that Guede confided that he really had committed the murder, along with two others. Not with Knox and Sollecito.

A very angry Rudy Guede in turn wrote a letter denying this which very rapidly went public.

In 2011 there was a tense confrontation in the Hellmann court (which several times descended into chaos) when this letter, in which by now Guede firmly accuses Knox and Sollecito, was read out for him.

Guede stuck to this position on the stand, and he was not required to face full cross-examination by the shrill, frustrated defenses because he was already convicted and no longer the one on trial.

Fast-forward to today, where reports say that Guede is getting close to day-release for study purposes and may only be months away from making more evidence against Sollecito and Knox public.

Seemingly fed up with the now-incessant Knox and Sollecito mantras in the media that Guede had acted alone, he has come out with another letter.

Italy’s AGI News Service has posted this letter to an unidentified recipient, along with this report.

(AGI) Perugia, February 11 “Against me are being repeated false imaginated reconstructions of the crime for the sole purpose of wanting to denigrate my figure and person, systematically and in a negative way, in the public eye and not just in Italy.”

He apparently also posted what he wrote in his own hand on the Facebook page “Legal processes and their surroundings”...

The letter is on a sheet of notebook paper handwritten and signed by Guede.

“To my regret I am again forced to take a pen and paper and write for the sake of the truth.. to all those thousands of people who still believe in justice.”

“They can not access all the pleadings and components of this sad and extremely complex legal case which was dramatically painful for those who lived it . My sentence and judicial reasoning have been for too long subject to a continuous and willful manipulation and alteration of the data of the proceedings.”

“Against me are made continuous false and imaginary reconstructions for the sole purpose of wanting to denigrate my figure and person, systematically and in a negative way in the public eye and not just the Italian.”

“In the final judgment, as far as I’m concerned about these false and imaginative reconstructions, is that I was acquitted of theft and simulation of crime, a fact that I never hear mentioned in the various journalistic reconstructions.”

“I also want to point out I do not accept in any way to be passed off and continually held up as a drifter, a thief, a homeless man, seeing my person and my dignity offended continually, denigrated and stereotyped by facts and things that do not realte to me… when I had a beautiful family and precious squeaky clean and friendly relations in Perugia.”

Our posting lawyer TomM has looked at the issue of Guede being allowed out to study, and has provided us with this assessment.

I respect the Italian system of criminal justice. Just as I recognize that the Italian courts have much better information than anyone posting on the internet relating to the culpability of the defendants in this case, I also think that the people who oversee Guede’s stay in prison are better informed as to his fitness to be reintegrated into society. That he would be allowed out during work days to become better educated, returning to his prison cell at the end of the day seems to me a more enlightened approach than what we do here.

We used to have training programs in prisons. I don’t know that they were “cushy”, but they did work, so that when these convicts were released they were equipped with a marketable skill and rarely re-offended. But, the public thinks these were too cushy, so more Draconian circumstances and longer sentences are now the norm. It used to be people were sent to prison as punishment, now they are sent for punishment.

Sometimes when a prisoner who has spent his or her entire adult life in prison completes the sentence imposed, they have to be physically dragged from their cells, so ill-prepared are they for anything other than doing time. With no skills, social or job-related, they re-offend—surprise, surprise. Sometimes re-offense is for the purpose of being returned a world that, for all its dangers is, to them, relative safety.

While it is certainly true that prison doesn’t have much impact on sociopaths, the one thing they are attached to is money. Taking away their money does impact their behavior, so there is an alternative to killing them.


I'm leaving out the selfquoting links, just this one on the highlighted part:
PRESIDENTE – Lei in quanto imputato per gli stessi fatti per i quali è ora processo dinanzi a questa Corte di Assise, lei ha la facoltà di astenersi dal rispondere, dal deporre. Ci sono i suoi difensori, se ne è già dato atto a verbale, i suoi difensori di fiducia, entrambi sono presenti, quindi può scegliere sia di rispondere alle domande e sia di avvalersi della facoltà di non risponde; come ritiene.
TESTE – Mi avvalgo della facoltà di non rispondere.
PRESIDENTE - Si dà atto che si avvale della facoltà di non rispondere. Si prende atto e può accomodarsi.

Just remember this was posted on a site named "True Justice for Meredith Kercher" :confused:
He [Raffaele] is collateral damage in the unreasonable, irresponsible, and unrelenting scapegoating of the prosecution’s grotesque caricature that is “Foxy Knoxy”
~ Amanda Knox
Hans
 
Posts: 4544
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2011 8:41 pm
Location: Germany

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby Supernaut » Thu Feb 13, 2014 5:59 pm

Hans wrote:Image


Rudy Guede: "The Thinker"- he could have been Rodin's model, don't you think?

Behold, his noble visage!

(Actually, he looks like an ........)
Truth is truth though never so old and time cannot make that false which once was true - Edward de Vere

For truth is truth to the end of reckoning - Will Shake-speare
User avatar
Supernaut
 
Posts: 1532
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 11:57 am

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby ScifiTom » Mon Mar 17, 2014 8:00 am

To everyone

Hey everyone, poor Peter Quennell is at it again of going to ask the question of not knowing criminal law and mostly here is 3 of the article of what he has to say to us all of not knowing criminal law!!!

Poor Peter, we know you need help my friend, even a lot of time, police officer do mess up even more detectives mess up into their questioning over terror, and now Peter going to play the hard ball. So here is 3 article of what Peter has to say about the question of not knowing!!!

http://www.truejustice.org/ee/index.php ... e_profile/

http://www.truejustice.org/ee/index.php ... answering/

http://www.truejustice.org/ee/index.php ... _strategy/

In all of these article is what Peter Quennell thinks. Sooner or later Peter must be thinking the wrong way of not knowing criminal law, even there doing their jobs, even is it our business to both them. NO! Enough is enough, for crying out loud, and I prove this message to you all and talk to you soon everyone!!!
TMJ

Anne Hathaway number 1 fan

Free the Innocence 2

Free: Kirstin Lobato Las Vegas NV & Dusty Turner Norfolk VA
User avatar
ScifiTom
 
Posts: 4707
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:58 am
Location: Norfolk Va

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby ScifiTom » Mon Mar 17, 2014 8:06 am

To everyone

Hey everyone, to end this off, of a shocking way, that now Machavellia aka Yummi just only want to go after Giulia Bongiornos through to much madness even I can why he enjoying the spring break of March Madness of getting ready to watch the NCCA of going nuts that Italy team is losing in his favor of America so many times he can't take it so much, that he has to write this Bull crap of not making any sense of what on earth he writing or saying!!!

http://www.truejustice.org/ee/index.php ... arguments/
TMJ

Anne Hathaway number 1 fan

Free the Innocence 2

Free: Kirstin Lobato Las Vegas NV & Dusty Turner Norfolk VA
User avatar
ScifiTom
 
Posts: 4707
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:58 am
Location: Norfolk Va

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby Gibsie » Mon Mar 17, 2014 8:51 am

Such a bizarre writing style, but a good insight into the mindset they have. What really strikes me is that at no point does this person (or similar guilters) ever accept any semblance of improper behaviour, poor technique or even "honest" mistakes as having been committed by the investigators, prosectioon and supreme court.

It's just such a completely closed-off way of thinking that I struggle to understand. If we, as pro-innocence people consider the actions of Knox/Sollecito, then that doesn't close off our minds from thinking things like "This was a bad decision by Knox/Sollecito". We accept their mistakes, their blunders- as they are only human, and humans do make mistakes (but, murder is something else entirely, not committed by right-thinking people). If there is evidence against them, we accept it- or would, if any valid evidence were to exist. So many times I've read a guilter's argument that seemed cast-iron proof of, well, not murder exactly, but maybe for Knox to be a bad person, but on further examination, they're always basically fabrications.

Yet to the guilters every person involved in convicting Knox/Sollecito is a perfect, unblemished character who has never gotten anything wrong. The crime scene was treated perfectly, with no possibility of contamination. The break-in is impossible, even if a video exists to show it is very simple. If someone says "Not even Superman could perform this murder by himself", then it is accepted without question. If an experiment is run withno cntrols, not following the equipment's instructions, not repeated and indeed not repeatable at all, then that is perfectly acceptable. And if an experiment is repeated, in an improved fashion, but gives results they do not like, then the repeat is automatically wrong and irrelevant. It even goes so far as to see the same people shrieking about justice for Meredith to write thousands of words about poor Rudy Guede, who just wanted to be involved in some innocent lovemaking with Meredith, apparently. Why do (almost) none of the guilters object to this?
Gibsie
 
Posts: 82
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2014 3:51 pm

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby schmidt53 » Mon Mar 17, 2014 10:13 am

Gibsie wrote:Such a bizarre writing style, but a good insight into the mindset they have. What really strikes me is that at no point does this person (or similar guilters) ever accept any semblance of improper behaviour, poor technique or even "honest" mistakes as having been committed by the investigators, prosectioon and supreme court.

It's just such a completely closed-off way of thinking that I struggle to understand. If we, as pro-innocence people consider the actions of Knox/Sollecito, then that doesn't close off our minds from thinking things like "This was a bad decision by Knox/Sollecito". We accept their mistakes, their blunders- as they are only human, and humans do make mistakes (but, murder is something else entirely, not committed by right-thinking people). If there is evidence against them, we accept it- or would, if any valid evidence were to exist. So many times I've read a guilter's argument that seemed cast-iron proof of, well, not murder exactly, but maybe for Knox to be a bad person, but on further examination, they're always basically fabrications.

Yet to the guilters every person involved in convicting Knox/Sollecito is a perfect, unblemished character who has never gotten anything wrong. The crime scene was treated perfectly, with no possibility of contamination. The break-in is impossible, even if a video exists to show it is very simple. If someone says "Not even Superman could perform this murder by himself", then it is accepted without question. If an experiment is run withno cntrols, not following the equipment's instructions, not repeated and indeed not repeatable at all, then that is perfectly acceptable. And if an experiment is repeated, in an improved fashion, but gives results they do not like, then the repeat is automatically wrong and irrelevant. It even goes so far as to see the same people shrieking about justice for Meredith to write thousands of words about poor Rudy Guede, who just wanted to be involved in some innocent lovemaking with Meredith, apparently. Why do (almost) none of the guilters object to this?


Well written Gibsie. ::cool::
schmidt53
 
Posts: 1074
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2012 10:10 am

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby NickGreen90125 » Tue Mar 18, 2014 9:56 am

The disgusting groundswell of support for Rudy Guede from those who prefer to accuse Amanda and Raffaele is about as weird and surreal an example of human behaviour as it's possible to conceive. Is there any psychology major out there who can shed any rational light on this phenomenon? Because I sure as hell can't comprehend it.
NickGreen90125
 
Posts: 23
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 1:51 am

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby sept79 » Tue Mar 18, 2014 10:28 am

NickGreen90125 wrote:The disgusting groundswell of support for Rudy Guede from those who prefer to accuse Amanda and Raffaele is about as weird and surreal an example of human behaviour as it's possible to conceive. Is there any psychology major out there who can shed any rational light on this phenomenon? Because I sure as hell can't comprehend it.


The word 'rational' can not be applied in any way to this phenomenon . . .
sept79
 
Posts: 1412
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 7:16 am

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby KayPea » Wed Mar 19, 2014 2:44 pm

schmidt53 wrote:
Gibsie wrote:Such a bizarre writing style, but a good insight into the mindset they have. What really strikes me is that at no point does this person (or similar guilters) ever accept any semblance of improper behaviour, poor technique or even "honest" mistakes as having been committed by the investigators, prosectioon and supreme court.

It's just such a completely closed-off way of thinking that I struggle to understand. If we, as pro-innocence people consider the actions of Knox/Sollecito, then that doesn't close off our minds from thinking things like "This was a bad decision by Knox/Sollecito". We accept their mistakes, their blunders- as they are only human, and humans do make mistakes (but, murder is something else entirely, not committed by right-thinking people). If there is evidence against them, we accept it- or would, if any valid evidence were to exist. So many times I've read a guilter's argument that seemed cast-iron proof of, well, not murder exactly, but maybe for Knox to be a bad person, but on further examination, they're always basically fabrications.

Yet to the guilters every person involved in convicting Knox/Sollecito is a perfect, unblemished character who has never gotten anything wrong. The crime scene was treated perfectly, with no possibility of contamination. The break-in is impossible, even if a video exists to show it is very simple. If someone says "Not even Superman could perform this murder by himself", then it is accepted without question. If an experiment is run withno cntrols, not following the equipment's instructions, not repeated and indeed not repeatable at all, then that is perfectly acceptable. And if an experiment is repeated, in an improved fashion, but gives results they do not like, then the repeat is automatically wrong and irrelevant. It even goes so far as to see the same people shrieking about justice for Meredith to write thousands of words about poor Rudy Guede, who just wanted to be involved in some innocent lovemaking with Meredith, apparently. Why do (almost) none of the guilters object to this?


Well written Gibsie. ::cool::



Indeed. :worthy:
“If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it.”-- Marcus Aurelius
User avatar
KayPea
 
Posts: 3310
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 11:40 pm
Location: Seattle WA

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby Supernaut » Thu Apr 10, 2014 5:45 pm

TJMK is a totally self-funded volunteer-run website where nobody ever gets paid for anything.




"...honest! None of us ever gets paid for nuffink!"

LoL!

Could crooks like Peter Quennell and Naseer Ahmed make it any MORE obvious that they ARE paid?

Could they?

Anyone?

Really, the ONLY question is;

where is the lucre coming from?
Truth is truth though never so old and time cannot make that false which once was true - Edward de Vere

For truth is truth to the end of reckoning - Will Shake-speare
User avatar
Supernaut
 
Posts: 1532
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 11:57 am

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby Supernaut » Thu Apr 10, 2014 6:33 pm

WHO IS PAYING THESE CREEPS?
Truth is truth though never so old and time cannot make that false which once was true - Edward de Vere

For truth is truth to the end of reckoning - Will Shake-speare
User avatar
Supernaut
 
Posts: 1532
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 11:57 am

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby Niteangel » Thu Apr 10, 2014 8:57 pm

sept79 wrote:
NickGreen90125 wrote:The disgusting groundswell of support for Rudy Guede from those who prefer to accuse Amanda and Raffaele is about as weird and surreal an example of human behaviour as it's possible to conceive. Is there any psychology major out there who can shed any rational light on this phenomenon? Because I sure as hell can't comprehend it.


The word 'rational' can not be applied in any way to this phenomenon . . .


It is a result of hatred. They hate Amanda so much (and Raffaele to a lesser extent) that they are willing to blindly believe Amanda and Raffaele are guilty, just as they believe anything from the Prosecution and the police, while they automatically reject everything from the Defense and/or that is favorable to them, and to blindly believe that poor sweet and innocent Rudy is innocent. In a few of their multiple crazy scenarios they even believe that only Amanda is guilty, while both Raffaele and Rudy are innocent. The fact that there is no evidence whatsoever against Amanda is an irrelevant detail to them.
'It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts.' Sherlock Holmes
User avatar
Niteangel
 
Posts: 738
Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2014 9:15 pm

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby Bruce Fischer » Thu Apr 10, 2014 9:51 pm

We went almost a month with no activity on this thread and I didn't miss it at all. :)
"This could happen to any one of you. If you don't believe it could happen, you are either misinformed or in a state of deep denial" -- Debra Milke
User avatar
Bruce Fischer
Site Admin
 
Posts: 4470
Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 4:26 pm
Location: USA

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby ScifiTom » Fri Apr 11, 2014 7:11 am

Supernaut wrote:WHO IS PAYING THESE CREEPS?


To Supernaut

When Supernaut, I would love to know who is paying these creeps, even I think no one is paying them, even I just think they are failing the justice system of criminal law, even what more worst is that poor Peter Quennell is now want to talk about books of hated words of not knowing what inside a book. He thinks books are hurting him because he fail the justice system of criminal law. The poor man need to Grow up. So here the link of the site and let all talk about it right now, of why Poor Peter fail the justice system all over again!!!

http://www.truejustice.org/ee/index.php ... minefield/
TMJ

Anne Hathaway number 1 fan

Free the Innocence 2

Free: Kirstin Lobato Las Vegas NV & Dusty Turner Norfolk VA
User avatar
ScifiTom
 
Posts: 4707
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:58 am
Location: Norfolk Va

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby ScifiTom » Fri Apr 11, 2014 7:17 am

Bruce Fischer wrote:We went almost a month with no activity on this thread and I didn't miss it at all. :)


To Bruce

I am not sure Bruce, because I almost miss it with in a month even. My last time was March 17 and now it is April 11 I came back even I left 2 links on those dates and it like a no way disscussion of words. Oh well, no one want to talk about disscussion even I can see why? I am trying my best. I know it never easy to be me, in a way of reading words of why books are good to read, even let face it. Peter Quennell is now hating to read a novel of books, and I can see why he hates the book store, because he never want to go to the book store and read a novel!!!
TMJ

Anne Hathaway number 1 fan

Free the Innocence 2

Free: Kirstin Lobato Las Vegas NV & Dusty Turner Norfolk VA
User avatar
ScifiTom
 
Posts: 4707
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:58 am
Location: Norfolk Va

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby Bill Williams » Fri Apr 11, 2014 8:39 am

Bruce Fischer wrote:We went almost a month with no activity on this thread and I didn't miss it at all. :)

It's one of those guilty pleasures. Every once in a while I click on over there and it is always the same: why'd I do that? Grahame Rhodes says something slutty or threatening about Knox, Peter Quennell goes off on an opinion from one of his "Hundreds of lawyers", without ever once saying who... not even if it was Dershowitz....

At the end of the day TJMK website adds nothing of substance.
    “The only way I can pay back for what fate and society have handed me is to try, in minor totally useless ways, to make an angry sound against injustice.”
    Martha Gellhorn
Bill Williams
 
Posts: 8084
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 5:49 pm

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby ScifiTom » Tue Apr 22, 2014 2:08 pm

To everyone

Hey everyone, is it me or is it Machavellia has now lost it again of saying this: The defenses really don’t want you to know this: in both width and depth, the full panoply of the evidence against Knox and Sollecito is absolutely overwhelming.

Really Mach, even it over welm for you of an evidence, even let face it, that Rudy went to the bathroom of going to the potty, even now your saying this. But no my friend there more of what Mach said next: The 2010 Massei Trial Report (which the Nencini Appeal court validated this past January) is a SUMMARY of what was presented to the judges in the courtroom. Those presentations in court were in turn something of a SUMMARY of the hard evidence buried in all the evidence files and the minds of witnesses.

Italian media SUMMARISED for Italians what was to be seen in the courtroom and to be read in the Massei Report. They were barely able to do even summaries for the 1/4 of all the trial hearings that were not open to the media or the public.

UK and US media for the most part didnt even bother to provide comprehensive summaries (the very fine on-the-spot reportings of Andrea Vogt, Barbie Nadeau and Ann Wise were the main exceptions).

So in effect people in the UK and US attempting to follow the story didnt for the most part receive even a summary of a summary of a summary!


Their millions of people following a story, of Andrea Vogt, Barbie Nadeau and Ann Wise. I am not sure what your reading, unless it guilt. But let face it, you did said to me: TMJ I stop reading at the age of 12 That means I have a great memory in my past tense, even I take that for granted and it is were I stand of why I care to read a novel!!!

The contrasted image is showing the presence of other stains

There are other stains on the carpet (about another 10, factually occupying half the entire mat area), and also there shows a second diluted footprint (apparently from a foot of smaller size).

The stain of evidence. Oh ok so someone made a boo, boo of seeing blood type, or was it dirt germs of to much mix tan blood of not the right proof of foot print!!!

Observe the small red ‘dots’ in the picture above

Although we can’t draw any conclusion about their possibly significance, we note the existence of these very small ‘spots’ of a faint red colour shade, separated from the big stain.

They are detected by the computer generated outline above, and that we also see as distinguishable with the naked eye thus we considered them in drawing manually the outline.

We don’t draw any conclusion about them; but because of their sensitive position (they may suggest a ‘small toe’ mark) we take note of them.

The green arrows in the picture point out their position (green circles).

Well course Machaveilli we can't draw best conque-tion of crime law even sure everyone makes mistakes into DNA evidence of spills and trust me, if some per person is doing the evidence they got to clean up the evidence or we are missing a piece of piece or the whole case is being well like something like this: :stir: :stir: :stir: Yep my friend the pot is stiring into a huge mess of what the police is cooking on Amanda Knox of right now!!!

But finally here what Machaveillia save for last: This picture shows the distribution and intensity of the colouration.
Let get one thing straight, I am not going to give you all detail of Mach said: Why? Because it to risked of ways and I just don't agree even he trying to make it harder of hitting himself into a no way debate of not knowing? Bare feet is Rudy Guede, while he thinks it Raffaele Sollecto. Raffaele was never bare feet, only Amanda would be barefeet of taking a shower even she saw blood, even it cause a huge action. So their fore the killer is still Rudy Guede, not Raffaele or Amanda, and it were I stand and here the whole article!!!

http://www.truejustice.org/ee/index.php ... vidence_1/

Just a reminder? Why is it the TJMK never talk about me? Want to know why because they are afraid of me? Let face it, they are chicken scary of me. I never done a thing, unless I am only telling what it is, and it were I stand of innocent to be proven of if the crime was guilt. Either way count and thanks for reading this and enjoy reading the article and talk to you soon!!!
TMJ

Anne Hathaway number 1 fan

Free the Innocence 2

Free: Kirstin Lobato Las Vegas NV & Dusty Turner Norfolk VA
User avatar
ScifiTom
 
Posts: 4707
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:58 am
Location: Norfolk Va

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby ScifiTom » Tue Apr 22, 2014 2:18 pm

To everyone

Hey everyone this will be my last post of today and I will return later tonight, even I would love to heard from you of this new information that happen into a buyer club, even yes my friend we are talking about the buyers even who are the buyers. The Shark Tank or Donald Trump!!!

http://www.truejustice.org/ee/index.php ... good_idea/

That is the official link of site, and let face it, that TJMK hate buyer and call it: Buyer beware of a very good price. Amanda is not a buyer she only a supporter of innocent and for that part, I am not sure where this is coming from, or who the heck wrote this. So let talk about it right now and that all and see you later tonight and talk to you soon!!!
TMJ

Anne Hathaway number 1 fan

Free the Innocence 2

Free: Kirstin Lobato Las Vegas NV & Dusty Turner Norfolk VA
User avatar
ScifiTom
 
Posts: 4707
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:58 am
Location: Norfolk Va

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby MichaelB » Tue May 06, 2014 2:42 am

Quennell more insane than ever.

I really hope Gumbel gets a term in prison. A long one. I hope this destroys his career.

This pathetic coward has set out to damage IN ENGLISH and in the United States a great many people who cannott neccessarily read English and have almost no ways of fighting back.

Gumbel has clearly committed serious obstruction of justice crimes under Italian law. The macho idiot had plenty of warning.

This is not free speech, it is deliberately lying to try to poison public opinion to over-rule a jury.

And it is not speaking out against Italian corruption. There is very little within, the justice system which is carefully set up to prevent it.

And the only corruption here was by the court and consultants of HELLMANN who Gumbel is slavishly obsequious to.

Not only is Gumbel liable at law in Italy, he is also liable in the US and the UK. We know there are lawyers eager to take him on.

Fire away, guys. Demolish him financially. There are good people who could use the money.

Posted by Peter Quennell on 05/01/14 at 09:45 PM
The stupid things Ergon says - THE BEST OF NASEER AHMAD: "Curatolo's testimony is one of the bedrock foundations of my beliefs in this case."
User avatar
MichaelB
 
Posts: 6172
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 10:07 pm
Location: Perryville Prison

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby Annella » Tue May 06, 2014 2:53 am

I so wish my PC behaved enough for me to post a pic with the name


'THE WRITING IS ON THE WALL'

:lol: :lol: :lol:

That is what Fast/Greasy/Sleazy Pete is coming to terms with. Be prepared for escalation. He knows no other pathway and God forbid the next victim he 'advocates' for. :sadno:
'The Italian concept of judicial truth does not trouble itself with reality; it controls the narrative by controlling the past"
User avatar
Annella
 
Posts: 1429
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 6:19 pm

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby NotEvenWrong » Tue May 06, 2014 4:37 am

MichaelB wrote:Quennell more insane than ever.

I really hope Gumbel gets a term in prison. A long one. I hope this destroys his career.

This pathetic coward has set out to damage IN ENGLISH and in the United States a great many people who cannott neccessarily read English and have almost no ways of fighting back.

Gumbel has clearly committed serious obstruction of justice crimes under Italian law. The macho idiot had plenty of warning.

This is not free speech, it is deliberately lying to try to poison public opinion to over-rule a jury.

And it is not speaking out against Italian corruption. There is very little within, the justice system which is carefully set up to prevent it.

And the only corruption here was by the court and consultants of HELLMANN who Gumbel is slavishly obsequious to.

Not only is Gumbel liable at law in Italy, he is also liable in the US and the UK. We know there are lawyers eager to take him on.

Fire away, guys. Demolish him financially. There are good people who could use the money.

Posted by Peter Quennell on 05/01/14 at 09:45 PM


This is seriously a cult. Peter Quennell is a sociopathic internet loser version of David Koresh. I doubt these people go out in public much, so at least they can't meet up to drink the kool-aid (literally, at least. They passed the figurative version of that years ago.)
NotEvenWrong
 
Posts: 263
Joined: Sun Apr 28, 2013 11:23 am

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby Annella » Tue May 06, 2014 6:12 am

Can somebody put Pete's rant into a tweetable format? Would love to share his lunacy!

Oh man...just read Petey going on about 'reading English' and he did the big faux pas!! 'cannott'...LMAO!
'The Italian concept of judicial truth does not trouble itself with reality; it controls the narrative by controlling the past"
User avatar
Annella
 
Posts: 1429
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 6:19 pm

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby KayPea » Tue May 06, 2014 12:32 pm

Annella wrote:Can somebody put Pete's rant into a tweetable format? Would love to share his lunacy!

Oh man...just read Petey going on about 'reading English' and he did the big faux pas!! 'cannott'...LMAO!


Peter Quennell shrilly descries authors who use of ENGLISH is superior to the beleaguered blogger.

Peter Quennell protects Italian corruption in shrill online rant.
“If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it.”-- Marcus Aurelius
User avatar
KayPea
 
Posts: 3310
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 11:40 pm
Location: Seattle WA

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby Hans » Tue May 06, 2014 1:12 pm

Annella wrote:Can somebody put Pete's rant into a tweetable format? Would love to share his lunacy!

Oh man...just read Petey going on about 'reading English' and he did the big faux pas!! 'cannott'...LMAO!
Here you go:
445
:coke:
He [Raffaele] is collateral damage in the unreasonable, irresponsible, and unrelenting scapegoating of the prosecution’s grotesque caricature that is “Foxy Knoxy”
~ Amanda Knox
Hans
 
Posts: 4544
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2011 8:41 pm
Location: Germany

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby ScifiTom » Wed May 07, 2014 8:33 am

To everyone

Hey everyone it time to tell the truth or to not to tell the truth even is it harsh, well that what happen onto the TJMK Media of today topic and why this now for a issue!!!

http://www.truejustice.org/ee/index.php ... the_truth/

So how can this be negative of truth even are we hiding a truth or is it TJMK just want to hide a truth of knowing Amanda was innocent, even we all love to tell a true story or a lying story. Either one count of different type, of story. We all live basic of what we learn and how we learn it for a long journey!!!

http://www.answers.com/topic/the-golden ... tv-episode

Remember this episode it was about Rose who wanted to tell the truth about her husband life even she never fill the room of why she care about hiding of his will into a lied of not telling, even let face it. Charlie & Sophia both hate brosucel scout even yes Sophia want them in her purse. But in the end Rose make up to save a primly of why she care. Maybe if Stephaine Kercher learn the truth that Amanda was innocent all along even this would be soon over of how it happen into a truth meaning of words of innocent!!!
TMJ

Anne Hathaway number 1 fan

Free the Innocence 2

Free: Kirstin Lobato Las Vegas NV & Dusty Turner Norfolk VA
User avatar
ScifiTom
 
Posts: 4707
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:58 am
Location: Norfolk Va

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby Supernaut » Fri May 09, 2014 6:50 pm

Quite simply - I cannot credit the likes of Peter Quennell and Naseer Ahmed with anything resembling sincerity, and neither can I believe that anyone could be as deranged as they seem while maintaining their "personas" over a period of many years.

Ockham would have it that they're paid for what they do.

IOW, stone-cold mercenary arse-holes

ETA>> Stone-cold? Perhaps not entirely - they seem to get some enjoyment from their work.
Truth is truth though never so old and time cannot make that false which once was true - Edward de Vere

For truth is truth to the end of reckoning - Will Shake-speare
User avatar
Supernaut
 
Posts: 1532
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 11:57 am

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby Supernaut » Sat May 10, 2014 3:22 pm

MichaelB wrote:Quennell more insane than ever.

I really hope Gumbel gets a term in prison. A long one. I hope this destroys his career.

This pathetic coward has set out to damage IN ENGLISH and in the United States a great many people who cannott neccessarily read English and have almost no ways of fighting back.

Gumbel has clearly committed serious obstruction of justice crimes under Italian law. The macho idiot had plenty of warning.

This is not free speech, it is deliberately lying to try to poison public opinion to over-rule a jury.

And it is not speaking out against Italian corruption. There is very little within, the justice system which is carefully set up to prevent it.

And the only corruption here was by the court and consultants of HELLMANN who Gumbel is slavishly obsequious to.

Not only is Gumbel liable at law in Italy, he is also liable in the US and the UK. We know there are lawyers eager to take him on.

Fire away, guys. Demolish him financially. There are good people who could use the money.

Posted by Peter Quennell on 05/01/14 at 09:45 PM


Quennell isn't very intelligent, is he?

For someone of his age, his grammar and prose is dreadful. It's as if his language skills haven't advanced since he was a teenager.

"And the only corruption here was by the court and consultants of HELLMANN who Gumbel is slavishly obsequious to."

Not very intelligent? Strike that - he's just plain moronic.
Truth is truth though never so old and time cannot make that false which once was true - Edward de Vere

For truth is truth to the end of reckoning - Will Shake-speare
User avatar
Supernaut
 
Posts: 1532
Joined: Mon Oct 11, 2010 11:57 am

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby Annella » Sat May 10, 2014 11:46 pm

I have tried to restrain myself and not post anything in this or the PMF thread, but have to share this, from a new resident loonie at Pete's Place. :jaw-dropping:

ah, Peter, you have mentioned me here. What I really want to tie together is both the real motivations of the players - particularly correcting that of RS - and then help folk understand AK’s as a schizophrenic attachment-disordered somnambulist hallucinating an alternate reality based on her obsession with J. K. Rowling’s world.

Then, you tie in the neurolinguistics, neuroscience, optic neurology, learning styles and brain leanings, graphology, hypnotic states of mind and how these are manifested in the body and the choices of drugs and behaviors she uses to self-medicate which has resulted in AK’s current state of somnambulism. Everything that I will mention is from several hard core sciences which are as valid and reliable an any DNA analysis. The kind of questioning and approach that have not been but need to be used with AK will remain between you and me.

I want to do the kind of piece that every FOA sees - every single one. And I want to put forth the challenge to them, that if they want Amanda to be healed of whatever trauma she has experienced and let the truth come out all that it will be necessary for her to spend several hours alone with the Head Mistress of Hogwarts and that happens to be me…

By the way, there are so many superb posts on this site. What is the possibility of gathering several into a book with all publication profits going to MK’s family?

Pax.

Posted by Friendofstfrank on 05/10/14 at 12:55 AM | #
'The Italian concept of judicial truth does not trouble itself with reality; it controls the narrative by controlling the past"
User avatar
Annella
 
Posts: 1429
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 6:19 pm

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby kermit the frog » Sun May 11, 2014 4:46 am

Who is Hogwart?
je suis Charlie
User avatar
kermit the frog
 
Posts: 585
Joined: Mon Feb 17, 2014 11:59 am
Location: Germany

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby ScifiTom » Sun May 11, 2014 6:27 am

kermit the frog wrote:Who is Hogwart?


To Kermit

Hey Kermit, who is Hogwart? It is a group of character who play into a movie of Harry Potter series and there was only 7 books of Harry Potter, even I only liked Book one to 3 & 7, even also the movie. I didn't enjoy the rest, at all. But here is a picture of the whole team of Harry Potter!!!

Image

This was a picture of close by to the end of Harry Potter 7 even it was a shocker to the end of how to fake the death!!!
TMJ

Anne Hathaway number 1 fan

Free the Innocence 2

Free: Kirstin Lobato Las Vegas NV & Dusty Turner Norfolk VA
User avatar
ScifiTom
 
Posts: 4707
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:58 am
Location: Norfolk Va

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby ScifiTom » Sun May 11, 2014 6:40 am

Supernaut wrote:
MichaelB wrote:Quennell more insane than ever.

I really hope Gumbel gets a term in prison. A long one. I hope this destroys his career.

This pathetic coward has set out to damage IN ENGLISH and in the United States a great many people who cannott neccessarily read English and have almost no ways of fighting back.

Gumbel has clearly committed serious obstruction of justice crimes under Italian law. The macho idiot had plenty of warning.

This is not free speech, it is deliberately lying to try to poison public opinion to over-rule a jury.

And it is not speaking out against Italian corruption. There is very little within, the justice system which is carefully set up to prevent it.

And the only corruption here was by the court and consultants of HELLMANN who Gumbel is slavishly obsequious to.

Not only is Gumbel liable at law in Italy, he is also liable in the US and the UK. We know there are lawyers eager to take him on.

Fire away, guys. Demolish him financially. There are good people who could use the money.

Posted by Peter Quennell on 05/01/14 at 09:45 PM


Quennell isn't very intelligent, is he?

For someone of his age, his grammar and prose is dreadful. It's as if his language skills haven't advanced since he was a teenager.

"And the only corruption here was by the court and consultants of HELLMANN who Gumbel is slavishly obsequious to."

Not very intelligent? Strike that - he's just plain moronic.


To Supernaut & Michael B.

Hey Supernaut, Peter Quennell never even study criminal law, even he doesn't get it at all, of how criminal law works. I only think he not knowing what it means, even he pro-claim of his own intelligent words, of not knowing. I can nail him a lot of how I disagree of what he said and I prove that wits on my own blog, already, even I would do it again and again!!!

Hey Michael B. thanks for the information and keep up the good work, my friend!!!
TMJ

Anne Hathaway number 1 fan

Free the Innocence 2

Free: Kirstin Lobato Las Vegas NV & Dusty Turner Norfolk VA
User avatar
ScifiTom
 
Posts: 4707
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:58 am
Location: Norfolk Va

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby ScifiTom » Sun May 11, 2014 6:46 am

To everyone

Hey everyone, get ready for Peter Quennell next article of what on earth is he saying? Well yesterday night, at 7:53pm he told the world that we are going to get blow away of a science hoax of crime and that what it is, and here the article of what he saying to the world of not knowing criminal law!!!

http://www.truejustice.org/ee/index.php ... pearances/

The man is stupid even he never study criminal law. My golly he use this phrase of crime wave law and thinks that way of not knowing what it means. I truly love it, of what on earth is he saying to us all!!!
TMJ

Anne Hathaway number 1 fan

Free the Innocence 2

Free: Kirstin Lobato Las Vegas NV & Dusty Turner Norfolk VA
User avatar
ScifiTom
 
Posts: 4707
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:58 am
Location: Norfolk Va

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby Screen Name Pending » Sun May 11, 2014 7:33 am

That link takes you to the FBI website.
The guilters are computer experts who can't get or keep a job.
They do free lance work for an Italian PR firm.
The project they are working on is to bust the myth that Amanda was framed.
When news about Amanda Knox reached the U.S. American journalists where suspicious when they read about how AK + RS were on trial for a crime that someone else had been convicted of. American editors tended to not publish the story at all or publish stories about the crazy Italians who were convicting a Pretty American Girl and her boyfriend who were obviously innocent. The Italian PR firm has been hoping this story would just go away and be forgotten about because the image of Italy that Americans see is important.
But, no, it kept going.
Their problem is now that everyone has a computer, everyone can do some fact checking, so the PR firm has found it neccesary to keep putting propaganda into the net, so whenever someone does a search the will hear their side of the story.
User avatar
Screen Name Pending
 
Posts: 333
Joined: Mon May 13, 2013 7:28 pm

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby Screen Name Pending » Sun May 11, 2014 10:41 am

So, if you guys at TJMK want anyone to take you seriously you have to answer 2 questions.
1 What witness testimony is there from anyone who saw AK + RS do anything illegal.
2 What evidence is there that proves anything.
You have to answer these questions directly and in give answers that are believeable.
You may say that you don't have to answer any questions, but if you don't people will think you have something to hide.
Get it? If you want to talk about Amanda being a liar, we don't care, you have to talk about Amanda being a killer.
User avatar
Screen Name Pending
 
Posts: 333
Joined: Mon May 13, 2013 7:28 pm

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby ScifiTom » Fri May 30, 2014 12:26 pm

To everyone

Hey everyone, I am sorry for a late one. But here you go for 2 of them, into a lied of crime!!!

http://www.truejustice.org/ee/index.php ... on_hoax_4/

TJMK thinks Amanda lies to the world of not knowing, even not the first picture, of the staring ways. But did you know that someone is staring through hate, yep my friend they are staring. But after the 2nd picture they are staring at Patrick Lumba of why? & How? What does this mean? The world will never know until our jaws dropped like this way of criminal law :jaw-dropping: While we won a shocking surpise!!!

Italy hard line is a crime for Peter Quennell of not knowing criminal law, even that is the whole issue of poor Peter want the hard line through Ted Simon criminal investigation of crime. But face it Peter you never study criminal law, even yes you eat at Joe Resturant and people see why your a stranger of guilt!!!

http://www.truejustice.org/ee/index.php ... americans/

So enjoy reading both article of why it fail for the TJMK site!!!
TMJ

Anne Hathaway number 1 fan

Free the Innocence 2

Free: Kirstin Lobato Las Vegas NV & Dusty Turner Norfolk VA
User avatar
ScifiTom
 
Posts: 4707
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:58 am
Location: Norfolk Va

Re: Amanda Knox Case Public Discussion Forum 2-8-2011

Postby Bruce Fischer » Mon Jun 02, 2014 2:52 pm

The lunatic Peter Quennell continues to hope that I serve time in an Italian prison. The man is seriously ill. I find this hilarious.

Peter Quennell: "Breaking news. Sollecito and Andrew Gumbel can add "facing felony charges" to their resumes. A Florence judge found no excuse for the myriad felony lies in Sollecito's book. Read some lie rebuttals here. Legal buzz is Gumbel should roll over pronto on Bruce Fischer, main inventor and disseminator of felony lies, who could be painted as more deserving of prison. Saul Kassin and others burned by Fischer may endorse that."
"This could happen to any one of you. If you don't believe it could happen, you are either misinformed or in a state of deep denial" -- Debra Milke
User avatar
Bruce Fischer
Site Admin
 
Posts: 4470
Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 4:26 pm
Location: USA

Re: Amanda Knox Case Public Discussion Forum 2-8-2011

Postby dopre » Mon Jun 02, 2014 4:28 pm

Legal Buzz? Is that coming from the flies attracted to this dung?

Run Bruce....run for the hills!! LOL
dopre
 
Posts: 155
Joined: Wed Jun 26, 2013 6:49 pm

Re: Amanda Knox Case Public Discussion Forum 2-8-2011

Postby Tablebeforme » Mon Jun 02, 2014 4:51 pm

Bruce Fischer wrote:The lunatic Peter Quennell continues to hope that I serve time in an Italian prison. The man is seriously ill. I find this hilarious.

Peter Quennell: "Breaking news. Sollecito and Andrew Gumbel can add "facing felony charges" to their resumes. A Florence judge found no excuse for the myriad felony lies in Sollecito's book. Read some lie rebuttals here. Legal buzz is Gumbel should roll over pronto on Bruce Fischer, main inventor and disseminator of felony lies, who could be painted as more deserving of prison. Saul Kassin and others burned by Fischer may endorse that."



Don't you have to take a test to become a US citizen? Either this guy is NOT a US citizen or we seriously need to revamp that test! :::thumbs up:::
Tablebeforme
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Sat May 24, 2014 4:20 pm

Re: Amanda Knox Case Public Discussion Forum 2-8-2011

Postby ScifiTom » Mon Jun 02, 2014 4:59 pm

Bruce Fischer wrote:The lunatic Peter Quennell continues to hope that I serve time in an Italian prison. The man is seriously ill. I find this hilarious.

Peter Quennell: "Breaking news. Sollecito and Andrew Gumbel can add "facing felony charges" to their resumes. A Florence judge found no excuse for the myriad felony lies in Sollecito's book. Read some lie rebuttals here. Legal buzz is Gumbel should roll over pronto on Bruce Fischer, main inventor and disseminator of felony lies, who could be painted as more deserving of prison. Saul Kassin and others burned by Fischer may endorse that."


To Bruce

Hey Bruce, Peter Quennell is dumb as a stone, and why else, he never goes after me? You want the answer. He to afraid of me, no wonder all the PMF members is afraid of TMJ!!!
TMJ

Anne Hathaway number 1 fan

Free the Innocence 2

Free: Kirstin Lobato Las Vegas NV & Dusty Turner Norfolk VA
User avatar
ScifiTom
 
Posts: 4707
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:58 am
Location: Norfolk Va

Re: Amanda Knox Case Public Discussion Forum 2-8-2011

Postby acbytesla » Mon Jun 02, 2014 5:32 pm

Tablebeforme wrote:
Bruce Fischer wrote:The lunatic Peter Quennell continues to hope that I serve time in an Italian prison. The man is seriously ill. I find this hilarious.

Peter Quennell: "Breaking news. Sollecito and Andrew Gumbel can add "facing felony charges" to their resumes. A Florence judge found no excuse for the myriad felony lies in Sollecito's book. Read some lie rebuttals here. Legal buzz is Gumbel should roll over pronto on Bruce Fischer, main inventor and disseminator of felony lies, who could be painted as more deserving of prison. Saul Kassin and others burned by Fischer may endorse that."



Don't you have to take a test to become a US citizen? Either this guy is NOT a US citizen or we seriously need to revamp that test! :::thumbs up:::

I'm not sure I want to know all that PQ had to say. But obviously PQ didn't go to law school.
acbytesla
 
Posts: 1545
Joined: Mon May 28, 2012 2:46 am

Re: Amanda Knox Case Public Discussion Forum 2-8-2011

Postby ScifiTom » Mon Jun 02, 2014 5:41 pm

acbytesla wrote:
Tablebeforme wrote:
Bruce Fischer wrote:The lunatic Peter Quennell continues to hope that I serve time in an Italian prison. The man is seriously ill. I find this hilarious.

Peter Quennell: "Breaking news. Sollecito and Andrew Gumbel can add "facing felony charges" to their resumes. A Florence judge found no excuse for the myriad felony lies in Sollecito's book. Read some lie rebuttals here. Legal buzz is Gumbel should roll over pronto on Bruce Fischer, main inventor and disseminator of felony lies, who could be painted as more deserving of prison. Saul Kassin and others burned by Fischer may endorse that."



Don't you have to take a test to become a US citizen? Either this guy is NOT a US citizen or we seriously need to revamp that test! :::thumbs up:::

I'm not sure I want to know all that PQ had to say. But obviously PQ didn't go to law school.


To Acby

I agree with you Acby, even you are right that PQ never went to law school at all. The place where he went was called: Joe Unnversity college even it like I eat at Joe of don't eat at Joe restaurant and then you will see all of those cartoons of why we should never eat at Joe!!!
TMJ

Anne Hathaway number 1 fan

Free the Innocence 2

Free: Kirstin Lobato Las Vegas NV & Dusty Turner Norfolk VA
User avatar
ScifiTom
 
Posts: 4707
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:58 am
Location: Norfolk Va

Re: Amanda Knox Case Public Discussion Forum 2-8-2011

Postby Cherocoy » Mon Jun 02, 2014 7:00 pm

To: Peter Quenell

"Breaking News. You will be going to Prison before Bruce Fischer, Dumbass."

From: Cherocoy (the mad Cherokee named Coy from the Great Pacific NW)

PS: I hope you wear your pink tuttoo in prison: you'll be popular :)
Cherocoy
 
Posts: 411
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2012 11:47 am

Re: Amanda Knox Case Public Discussion Forum 2-8-2011

Postby acbytesla » Mon Jun 02, 2014 7:38 pm

Cherocoy wrote:To: Peter Quenell

"Breaking News. You will be going to Prison before Bruce Fischer, Dumbass."

From: Cherocoy (the mad Cherokee named Coy from the Great Pacific NW)

PS: I hope you wear your pink tuttoo in prison: you'll be popular :)

What the hell is a Cherokee doing in the Pacific NW?
acbytesla
 
Posts: 1545
Joined: Mon May 28, 2012 2:46 am

Re: Amanda Knox Case Public Discussion Forum 2-8-2011

Postby Cherocoy » Mon Jun 02, 2014 7:58 pm

acbytesla wrote:
Cherocoy wrote:To: Peter Quenell

"Breaking News. You will be going to Prison before Bruce Fischer, Dumbass."

From: Cherocoy (the mad Cherokee named Coy from the Great Pacific NW)

PS: I hope you wear your pink tuttoo in prison: you'll be popular :)

What the hell is a Cherokee doing in the Pacific NW?


LOL :D

The Trail of Tears got my ancestors to Oklahoma. From there my Family emigrated, as if by Osmosis.

BTW: thnx Acbytesla for your recommendation of "Empires of Light", about a year ago, about Nicola Tesla. I read it, and you were right. Great book.

Now if only you start posting here more often, where this topic belongs. :) (We miss you)
Cherocoy
 
Posts: 411
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2012 11:47 am

Re: Amanda Knox Case Public Discussion Forum 2-8-2011

Postby ScifiTom » Mon Jun 02, 2014 8:01 pm

To everyone

Hey everyone, I will be glad to give you something special of how Peter Quennell act of guilt, and why would a belief of his own work thinks this is guilt and first he comes out of a brain case!!!

Watch on youtube.com


He use a guy name Alan Alda who pro claim that he came from a famous tv show called: Mash and it about a tv show of medicine and how they helped a wounded person who is hurt and it a living thing to do for our troops even yes the war, even it could collected DNA evidence through crime wave. But only Alan Alda become a character of playing an act and here is that picture right now!!!

Image

What Peter got right is a court of crime, even it not about the brain. What it about is how to work a case of detail through evidence even how many gotten wrongful convicted of crime and this video prove it all!!!

Watch on youtube.com


Beside that part, Peter will not agree with us, and why you ask because he thinks he a cat of playing a character, just like this cartoon character!!!

Image

This is what Peter Quennell is? Why? What? And How? Because I show it, even he thinks he being a guilt of not knowing, even yes it true that John Cena show it again of why he so good into telling of what is right for business and he did it again into Stephaine McMahon face, of someone need to slap her good!!!

But for me, I am not here for business unless it could be radio wave business. But I can care less of how Peter thinks he just doesn't get it, and that my friend is how Peter Quennell become a person doesn't get what coming to him, even he only going to believe into guilt of his own term of hate and what else to say to him, is nothing because that what he is in real life!!!
TMJ

Anne Hathaway number 1 fan

Free the Innocence 2

Free: Kirstin Lobato Las Vegas NV & Dusty Turner Norfolk VA
User avatar
ScifiTom
 
Posts: 4707
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:58 am
Location: Norfolk Va

Re: Amanda Knox Case Public Discussion Forum 2-8-2011

Postby acbytesla » Mon Jun 02, 2014 8:56 pm

Cherocoy wrote:
acbytesla wrote:
Cherocoy wrote:To: Peter Quenell

"Breaking News. You will be going to Prison before Bruce Fischer, Dumbass."

From: Cherocoy (the mad Cherokee named Coy from the Great Pacific NW)

PS: I hope you wear your pink tuttoo in prison: you'll be popular :)

What the hell is a Cherokee doing in the Pacific NW?


LOL :D

The Trail of Tears got my ancestors to Oklahoma. From there my Family emigrated, as if by Osmosis.

BTW: thnx Acbytesla for your recommendation of "Empires of Light", about a year ago, about Nicola Tesla. I read it, and you were right. Great book.

Now if only you start posting here more often, where this topic belongs. :) (We miss you)


I have a tendency to post on JREF and elsewhere on the net. It's too much of a love fest and echo chamber here sometimes. Glad to hear you enjoyed Empires of Light. You're the first person I have recommended that book to that has come back and said they read it. I've written a screenplay based on that book and several others about the "War of the Currents". Only trouble is that I hate the dialog. Can't seem to write dialog very well. Comes off wooden to me when I read it back to myself a few days later. And no matter how often I rewrite it, I hate it.
acbytesla
 
Posts: 1545
Joined: Mon May 28, 2012 2:46 am

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby Niteangel » Tue Jun 03, 2014 3:00 pm

I see the threads "Today over at PMF" and "Today over at TJMK", I read some of the comments, its always interesting, but myself I never comment on either of these websites ... I was thinking, since I mostly comment on youtube, maybe I should start a thread "Today over on Youtube". I'd have quite a bit to tell you, I probably know the majority of guilters there lol.
'It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts.' Sherlock Holmes
User avatar
Niteangel
 
Posts: 738
Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2014 9:15 pm

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby Bill Williams » Tue Jun 03, 2014 3:50 pm

Niteangel wrote:I see the threads "Today over at PMF" and "Today over at TJMK", I read some of the comments, its always interesting, but myself I never comment on either of these websites ... I was thinking, since I mostly comment on youtube, maybe I should start a thread "Today over on Youtube". I'd have quite a bit to tell you, I probably know the majority of guilters there lol.

As one of the originators of one "Today at..." thread, I truly regret it. I feelI've been responsible for given them far, far more notice than they would normally get otherwise.

But go for it..... maybe people need to go the full circle of trying to address their claims.

The IIP Wiki at murderofmerdithkercher.com is a response to the fake Wiki at themurderofmeredithkercher.com, and has perhaps had better effect in addressing the silliness and hate from that side of the fence. So who knows, maybe a "Today on YouTube...." will do the trick too.

Eventually though, one simply gets tired of the inanity at PMF(either one) or TJMK.
    “The only way I can pay back for what fate and society have handed me is to try, in minor totally useless ways, to make an angry sound against injustice.”
    Martha Gellhorn
Bill Williams
 
Posts: 8084
Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 5:49 pm

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby Niteangel » Tue Jun 03, 2014 4:29 pm

Bill Williams wrote:
Niteangel wrote:I see the threads "Today over at PMF" and "Today over at TJMK", I read some of the comments, its always interesting, but myself I never comment on either of these websites ... I was thinking, since I mostly comment on youtube, maybe I should start a thread "Today over on Youtube". I'd have quite a bit to tell you, I probably know the majority of guilters there lol.

As one of the originators of one "Today at..." thread, I truly regret it. I feelI've been responsible for given them far, far more notice than they would normally get otherwise.

But go for it..... maybe people need to go the full circle of trying to address their claims.

The IIP Wiki at murderofmerdithkercher.com is a response to the fake Wiki at themurderofmeredithkercher.com, and has perhaps had better effect in addressing the silliness and hate from that side of the fence. So who knows, maybe a "Today on YouTube...." will do the trick too.

Eventually though, one simply gets tired of the inanity at PMF(either one) or TJMK.


For me the point is that a lot of people see the videos on youtube, and my hope is that people will see my replies and comments (and other who support Amanda and Raffaele), and not see only the guilters' version. You never know, these other people (not the guilters) might become supporters, this is my hope. Also once in a while you meet the occasional semi-guilter, who believes A&R are guilty but who are not very informed about the case, and are not blinded by hate yet (mostly hate for Amanda, and a little bit for Raffaele), these people are the most likely to eventually see the light.

About the thread for youtube, I don't know yet, its just a thought for the moment. :)
'It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts.' Sherlock Holmes
User avatar
Niteangel
 
Posts: 738
Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2014 9:15 pm

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby ScifiTom » Wed Jun 04, 2014 7:28 pm

To everyone

Hey everyone, today is a topic of why this now? What you mean TMJ? What I mean is that Peter Quennell has now loses his sole of not knowing criminal law, even yes Chris Cumo has fail once of not being a good sport through the spelling bee words of not knowing why everyone is a winner as knowing they both won and GOD Chris Cumo GROW UP, even now Peter Quennell play the game of double brothers of 2 ways!!!

http://www.truejustice.org/ee/index.php ... erne_haot/

Will I ever get a respond, to this part even I can see it happen of double trouble twins!!!

Image VS Image

Will this work for me? I don't know, even it only a lucky guess. But let face it! Once again Peter has fail his job all over again!!!
TMJ

Anne Hathaway number 1 fan

Free the Innocence 2

Free: Kirstin Lobato Las Vegas NV & Dusty Turner Norfolk VA
User avatar
ScifiTom
 
Posts: 4707
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:58 am
Location: Norfolk Va

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby ScifiTom » Wed Jun 04, 2014 7:35 pm

Niteangel wrote:I see the threads "Today over at PMF" and "Today over at TJMK", I read some of the comments, its always interesting, but myself I never comment on either of these websites ... I was thinking, since I mostly comment on youtube, maybe I should start a thread "Today over on Youtube". I'd have quite a bit to tell you, I probably know the majority of guilters there lol.


To Night Angel

Hey Night Angel, I do see the thread through TJMK & PMF even I don't and never will comment on it, even I also watch YouTube videos. But I don't comment on that either. I am not a fan of the TJMK & PMF, even why? Because I stick were I stand and this is my place of where I like to post of inside of Injustice place. But about YouTube, I only watch the video, even I never comment even I have to register, even I don't know anything about this information. I only like to watch it and that who I am and goodnight Night Angel!!!
TMJ

Anne Hathaway number 1 fan

Free the Innocence 2

Free: Kirstin Lobato Las Vegas NV & Dusty Turner Norfolk VA
User avatar
ScifiTom
 
Posts: 4707
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:58 am
Location: Norfolk Va

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby Niteangel » Wed Jun 04, 2014 9:18 pm

ScifiTom wrote:
Niteangel wrote:I see the threads "Today over at PMF" and "Today over at TJMK", I read some of the comments, its always interesting, but myself I never comment on either of these websites ... I was thinking, since I mostly comment on youtube, maybe I should start a thread "Today over on Youtube". I'd have quite a bit to tell you, I probably know the majority of guilters there lol.


To Night Angel

Hey Night Angel, I do see the thread through TJMK & PMF even I don't and never will comment on it, even I also watch YouTube videos. But I don't comment on that either. I am not a fan of the TJMK & PMF, even why? Because I stick were I stand and this is my place of where I like to post of inside of Injustice place. But about YouTube, I only watch the video, even I never comment even I have to register, even I don't know anything about this information. I only like to watch it and that who I am and goodnight Night Angel!!!


Oh yes I like reading the comments here, and posting when I have something to say. And I know that if I need some information that I can't find I can ask people here. I comment on youtube (and articles) mainly for the reason I mention, I just don't want people to see only the guilters' version. Plus it makes me angry when I see the terrible things people say about Amanda (and sometimes about Raffaele too). But I understand if you don't, because it is tireing. I have been called many names for standing up for Amanda, but at this point I barely even care anymore about that, I am almost immune lol.
'It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts.' Sherlock Holmes
User avatar
Niteangel
 
Posts: 738
Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2014 9:15 pm

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby ScifiTom » Sat Jun 07, 2014 10:18 am

To everyone

Well everyone, we are now back into square one of why in the world did they bring this up, even now that Lisa Marie Basile, made something into famous Feminist of enminies of crime, into hate, and explain why the good detail of how she got it right. But now Hope comes out here today and wrote this, of her own way why the feminists is always right and we are wrong!!!

http://www.truejustice.org/ee/index.php ... feminists/

So Hope you bring out the 10 reason, even Lisa explain it into a text, even you explain different. So why did you bring this up, over the huffpost, of being hated, sure Aol company hate me, of saying the word: BLANKIT. Aol think I use bad judgement of anger into curse of that famous word and you bring up this baddest hated of hurting yourself, over again Hope. Hmmm let see. Do I have to tell the world why you hate GOD of the lord of Christ, so much! Hmmmmmm you said it a lot of time into Facebook, when you become our friends, and I deleted Hope of why she hate so much of God and now she acting like more hate. I just totally love it, I just can't wait to send this to one of my friend, into Facebook, even she doesn't want her name meant into it, and now you bring this up, all over again of not knowing anything into a court of law!!!
TMJ

Anne Hathaway number 1 fan

Free the Innocence 2

Free: Kirstin Lobato Las Vegas NV & Dusty Turner Norfolk VA
User avatar
ScifiTom
 
Posts: 4707
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:58 am
Location: Norfolk Va

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby Screen Name Pending » Sun Jun 08, 2014 8:47 am

"What if it had been AMANDA who had been murdered that night, and suspicion was thrust upon Meredith?"

There is a theory that Rudy was in the apartment committing a burgulary and Meridith arrived home, and he killed MK because if she was dead she would not tell anyone about the Black guy she found in her apartment. If you buy that, then yes Meridith would have been framed.
User avatar
Screen Name Pending
 
Posts: 333
Joined: Mon May 13, 2013 7:28 pm

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby Screen Name Pending » Sun Jun 08, 2014 11:01 am

Things would be different if Amanda was Meridith.
Meridith was British, not American.
back in 2007 an American Pilot killed a bunch of Italians with his airplane, and they thought he was guilty of wreckless flying. I don't remember anything that Italians would be mad at the British for.
Meridith was out with her British friends. They went back to Britain as soon as they heard about the murder, I suppose MK would have went with them.
But the big difference was MK was not Foxy Knoxy, she was not even foxy.
It would be less likely that the witch trial strategy would have worked.
Amanda was a feminist and she had this idea that she had an equal right to sex. So anything that it was OK for a man would do was OK for her to do. Anything a man could do Amanda could do.
Upon arriving in Italy Knox started an experiment, she would be promiscuous and see if she liked it.
A girl who looks like Knox can pick out any man to be her sex partner, and she will probably get him. She saw Rafael and thought that he was just right, and when she gave him that come hither stare he was under her spell.
Mignini did not have any facts to prove Amanda guilty, but he did have that alibi she told. He would have to sell the idea that Knox was guilty to the jury. That alibi was something he could start a sales pitch with, She said she spent that whole night at Rafael's place, smoking weed and making love.

To Mignini and many other people of his generation this was something a good girl did not do, and if she did, she would be too embarassed to admit it.
Amanda represented the decadence of the sinful younger generation.
If you say yes to Amanda's life style, then you say yes to promiscuity, STDs and abortion. Mignini said that Amanda may be a lot of things, but she sure isn't innocent.
He could not have done this with Meridith, she did not have the bewitching beauty Amanda did.
I don't know much about Meredith. I read somewhere that she refused to do anal intercourse, and she wasn't the party girl that Amanda was. {font}
User avatar
Screen Name Pending
 
Posts: 333
Joined: Mon May 13, 2013 7:28 pm

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby Screen Name Pending » Sun Jun 08, 2014 11:17 am

"they both won and GOD Chris Cumo GROW UP"
It's spelled Chris Cuomo , rhymes with Homo, which is what New Yorkers now call their Governor Cuomo, since he made gay marriage legal.
User avatar
Screen Name Pending
 
Posts: 333
Joined: Mon May 13, 2013 7:28 pm

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby Niteangel » Sun Jun 08, 2014 12:09 pm

corksoaker wrote:Things would be different if Amanda was Meridith.
Meridith was British, not American.
back in 2007 an American Pilot killed a bunch of Italians with his airplane, and they thought he was guilty of wreckless flying. I don't remember anything that Italians would be mad at the British for.
Meridith was out with her British friends. They went back to Britain as soon as they heard about the murder, I suppose MK would have went with them.
But the big difference was MK was not Foxy Knoxy, she was not even foxy.
It would be less likely that the witch trial strategy would have worked.
Amanda was a feminist and she had this idea that she had an equal right to sex. So anything that it was OK for a man would do was OK for her to do. Anything a man could do Amanda could do.
Upon arriving in Italy Knox started an experiment, she would be promiscuous and see if she liked it.
A girl who looks like Knox can pick out any man to be her sex partner, and she will probably get him. She saw Rafael and thought that he was just right, and when she gave him that come hither stare he was under her spell.
Mignini did not have any facts to prove Amanda guilty, but he did have that alibi she told. He would have to sell the idea that Knox was guilty to the jury. That alibi was something he could start a sales pitch with, She said she spent that whole night at Rafael's place, smoking weed and making love.

To Mignini and many other people of his generation this was something a good girl did not do, and if she did, she would be too embarassed to admit it.
Amanda represented the decadence of the sinful younger generation.
If you say yes to Amanda's life style, then you say yes to promiscuity, STDs and abortion. Mignini said that Amanda may be a lot of things, but she sure isn't innocent.
He could not have done this with Meridith, she did not have the bewitching beauty Amanda did.
I don't know much about Meredith. I read somewhere that she refused to do anal intercourse, and she wasn't the party girl that Amanda was. {font}


I wonder if things would have been different ...

Meredith possibly would have reacted the way the police expected of an innocent person, or not ... and so they might have focused on her, or not ...

If she hadn't been there that evening, it could have been because she was with Giacomo somewhere else ...

They (police) might have used Rudy and Meredith's common "interest" for vampires (remember his video, and Meredith's Halloween costume?) against her.

They might have used her (limited) knowledge of martial arts against her.

They might have assumed she left her DNA in Filomena's room, hallway, and bathroom, the night of the murder, like they have been doing for Amanda.

They might have used the fact that she was sleeping with a guy while not in a serious relationship with him, while she also had a boyfriend in England (unless I am mistaken, this has been mentioned a few times), against her.

They might have used the fact that Giacomo was growing pot at his apartment, and their use of drugs, against them.

They probably would have started digging in Giacomo's past and Meredith's as well, and twisted the reality just like they did for Amanda (guilters even turn a simple ticket for noise during a college party against her, as if she was actually a criminal).

But you're probably right, Meredith probably would have left with her friends asap after the murder.
'It is a capital mistake to theorize before one has data. Insensibly one begins to twist facts to suit theories, instead of theories to suit facts.' Sherlock Holmes
User avatar
Niteangel
 
Posts: 738
Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2014 9:15 pm

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby ScifiTom » Fri Jun 13, 2014 7:32 pm

To everyone

It so ashamed that the Machine sure does of shad of 50 grey, into a book of with these lies and tried to hurt himself, even sure he wanted to play the silly game again of into a love book novel. So here is the official link of site and enjoy reading it and talk to you soon everyone!!!

http://www.truejustice.org/ee/index.php ... _promoted/
TMJ

Anne Hathaway number 1 fan

Free the Innocence 2

Free: Kirstin Lobato Las Vegas NV & Dusty Turner Norfolk VA
User avatar
ScifiTom
 
Posts: 4707
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:58 am
Location: Norfolk Va

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby Hans » Sun Jun 15, 2014 3:04 pm

OK, I managed not to comment on "The Machine"'s "magnificent fifty" as they call them already, but I can't help to add a word or two to this:
Cardiol MD on 06/15/14 at 03:12 PM | # wrote:@Odysseous - agreeing with your 10:19 Comment - as a German-mother Edda probably knows that under German Law, IIUC, direct-blood relatives are not prosecutable for covering-up on each other.
The ties of blood are stronger, it is presumed, than the individual’s loyalty to the State?

On the highlighted part: I wonder how "Cardiol MD" (whoever that person is...) came to that conclusion? In Germany, after a witness identified him/herself, the witness is asked if he or she is in any way related to the defendant, if the witness answers "Yes." he or she is advised that he or she has a right not to testify. This is done to identify possibly biased witnesses and to prevent that family feuds taint the outcome of a trial.
In layman's words: in Germany a relative can choose not to testify against another family member, if a relative gives testimony, the court is aware of that and may take the relationship of the witness and the defendant into account...
How this lead "Cardiol MD"'s statement: "under German Law, IIUC, direct-blood relatives are not prosecutable for covering-up on each other." is something I don't understand... :Asche auf mein Haupt:
He [Raffaele] is collateral damage in the unreasonable, irresponsible, and unrelenting scapegoating of the prosecution’s grotesque caricature that is “Foxy Knoxy”
~ Amanda Knox
Hans
 
Posts: 4544
Joined: Fri Oct 21, 2011 8:41 pm
Location: Germany

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby MichaelB » Mon Jun 16, 2014 12:56 am

Hans wrote:OK, I managed not to comment on "The Machine"'s "magnificent fifty" as they call them already, but I can't help to add a word or two to this:
Cardiol MD on 06/15/14 at 03:12 PM | # wrote:@Odysseous - agreeing with your 10:19 Comment - as a German-mother Edda probably knows that under German Law, IIUC, direct-blood relatives are not prosecutable for covering-up on each other.
The ties of blood are stronger, it is presumed, than the individual’s loyalty to the State?

On the highlighted part: I wonder how "Cardiol MD" (whoever that person is...) came to that conclusion? In Germany, after a witness identified him/herself, the witness is asked if he or she is in any way related to the defendant, if the witness answers "Yes." he or she is advised that he or she has a right not to testify. This is done to identify possibly biased witnesses and to prevent that family feuds taint the outcome of a trial.
In layman's words: in Germany a relative can choose not to testify against another family member, if a relative gives testimony, the court is aware of that and may take the relationship of the witness and the defendant into account...
How this lead "Cardiol MD"'s statement: "under German Law, IIUC, direct-blood relatives are not prosecutable for covering-up on each other." is something I don't understand... :Asche auf mein Haupt:


That Cardiol is an interesting character. At one point he was one of TJMK's hundreds of lawyers but then he morphed into a medical doctor. :popcorn:
The stupid things Ergon says - THE BEST OF NASEER AHMAD: "Curatolo's testimony is one of the bedrock foundations of my beliefs in this case."
User avatar
MichaelB
 
Posts: 6172
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 10:07 pm
Location: Perryville Prison

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby ScifiTom » Wed Jun 18, 2014 3:30 pm

To everyone

Ok everyone, even I know some lawyers even yes defense lawyers do pat down there back to a client of how is the tough case, even now someone need a pat down and that is you Peter Quennell even why him, because Peter thinks blood is tough for poor Amanda and the money, even he trying to blame the defense of what? It makes no sense and this is like nonsense of their, their Amanda even here is the official link of what Peter is saying to us all, through the TJMK, of new update!!!

http://www.truejustice.org/ee/index.php ... ican_laws/

P S yes my friend Ergon wrote this today!!!

Ergon Wrote: Breaking News:

OJ Simpson says he never wrote “If I Did It” http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/06/1 ... ostpopular

His business manager states it was a Harper Collins ghostwriter who wrote it, for which OJ was given $600,000 cash by the publisher to put his name to it.

I know another murderer who got paid $4 million for ‘her’ story.


Sure, Ergon, even now you are supporting O J simpson of murder. The man is guilty even it show his proof of guilt even Amanda was innocent all along. I love it, even when ever he going to learn anything into a court of law!!!
TMJ

Anne Hathaway number 1 fan

Free the Innocence 2

Free: Kirstin Lobato Las Vegas NV & Dusty Turner Norfolk VA
User avatar
ScifiTom
 
Posts: 4707
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:58 am
Location: Norfolk Va

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby ScifiTom » Sun Jun 29, 2014 5:06 am

To everyone

Hey everyone, it just happen again that Peter Quennell has just lost it again of thinking we are inside the mud puddle of mud slime even that what he thinks of making this the mud slid and here is the link and enjoy reading it!!!

http://www.truejustice.org/ee/index.php ... emembers_/

But yes this guy want to talk about mud slime!!!
TMJ

Anne Hathaway number 1 fan

Free the Innocence 2

Free: Kirstin Lobato Las Vegas NV & Dusty Turner Norfolk VA
User avatar
ScifiTom
 
Posts: 4707
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:58 am
Location: Norfolk Va

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby Tablebeforme » Tue Jul 01, 2014 2:13 pm

ScifiTom wrote:To everyone

Hey everyone, it just happen again that Peter Quennell has just lost it again of thinking we are inside the mud puddle of mud slime even that what he thinks of making this the mud slid and here is the link and enjoy reading it!!!

http://www.truejustice.org/ee/index.php ... emembers_/

But yes this guy want to talk about mud slime!!!



Hi Tom! I always chuckle over their replies...."Wow, Ergon! You are so smart!" "Peter, I am impressed!" No wonder these stooges remain encouraged in their storytelling. But I think I know why some of this ego stroking happens. Commenters over there have to be so very careful not to step on toes, or even accidentally phrase something inconclusively. They are like the Soup Nazi over there. No actual debate allowed. Besides....I would not be surprised to find some of them replying to their own pretentious comments under different names. And that is just sad.
Tablebeforme
 
Posts: 55
Joined: Sat May 24, 2014 4:20 pm

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby ScifiTom » Wed Jul 02, 2014 7:38 pm

To everyone

Hey everyone, here I am again of Poor Peter Quennell still doesn't get it, even now he wants to go Quack, quack, quack and yes more quack of putting Raffaele Lawyer into a stunt double of Donald Duck into Giulia Bongiorno of hate into a fantasy of acting like Donald Duck!!!

Watch on youtube.com


Seriously Peter do you have to do this, of not knowing criminal law, even you think this act is a stunt. No I am not buying a phony into being of Raffaele Lawyer. So I assume yes you are that monkey and here is the proof of you being the monkey of right now!!!

Image
TMJ

Anne Hathaway number 1 fan

Free the Innocence 2

Free: Kirstin Lobato Las Vegas NV & Dusty Turner Norfolk VA
User avatar
ScifiTom
 
Posts: 4707
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:58 am
Location: Norfolk Va

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby ScifiTom » Wed Jul 02, 2014 7:48 pm

Tablebeforme wrote:
ScifiTom wrote:To everyone

Hey everyone, it just happen again that Peter Quennell has just lost it again of thinking we are inside the mud puddle of mud slime even that what he thinks of making this the mud slid and here is the link and enjoy reading it!!!

http://www.truejustice.org/ee/index.php ... emembers_/

But yes this guy want to talk about mud slime!!!



Hi Tom! I always chuckle over their replies...."Wow, Ergon! You are so smart!" "Peter, I am impressed!" No wonder these stooges remain encouraged in their storytelling. But I think I know why some of this ego stroking happens. Commenters over there have to be so very careful not to step on toes, or even accidentally phrase something inconclusively. They are like the Soup Nazi over there. No actual debate allowed. Besides....I would not be surprised to find some of them replying to their own pretentious comments under different names. And that is just sad.


To Table

Thank you Table, and I am glad you chuckle over their replies, even the sadness is on them, of why because, you are saying that they are like a soup of Nazi. Let me tell you this that if we go back into the Nazi world of knowing how bad Hilter really was, we wouldn't know him, even this movie never show Hilter. But it is a good movie, even first read the book, before you get the movie, and mark my word. This book was powerful and you will love it Table. Why? Because it has words, that the Nazi hate of not knowing criminal law, even what TJMK aka PMF hate to read a novel, even yes they have hard time of understand me, and what I say to them over and over again. Read a book. IT NOT GOING TO KILL YOU. I am sorry to shout. But it good to send a message to them, because they got to understand that reading comes from learning an education, and that is how it all started and here is the movie trailer right now!!!

Watch on youtube.com
TMJ

Anne Hathaway number 1 fan

Free the Innocence 2

Free: Kirstin Lobato Las Vegas NV & Dusty Turner Norfolk VA
User avatar
ScifiTom
 
Posts: 4707
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:58 am
Location: Norfolk Va

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby ScifiTom » Wed Jul 09, 2014 5:58 am

To everyone

Why is everyone want to be poor through a note book of cases, even the facts is what we do to take notes, even poor Alibi who like to become a journal of notes even Alibi hate people who spit on the street even walking around the neighbor hood. Gee whiz, I wonder why and here what Alibi all said into his or her own words!!!

http://www.truejustice.org/ee/index.php ... onference/

So Alibi, why are you righting this, did you notice that if someone who taking notes, it means a fact, even what you think of notes is all lies, even enough of the lies, and they look through the facts, some clients do take notes, even why else, because they are defending their self of or for their innocent of beliving the meaning of truth of proof even they are both innocent and it shows, why the whole case was a sloppy Joe mess, and it shamed of this nonsense crime wave case and that my friend were I draw the line of my own reason and talk to you soon!!!
TMJ

Anne Hathaway number 1 fan

Free the Innocence 2

Free: Kirstin Lobato Las Vegas NV & Dusty Turner Norfolk VA
User avatar
ScifiTom
 
Posts: 4707
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:58 am
Location: Norfolk Va

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby ScifiTom » Wed Jul 09, 2014 6:11 am

To everyone

More on Alibi even why else? I will tell you this, even the old days were good enough to study criminal law, even come on, don't we all need to take notes, even what best way take notes is by a notebook. No wonder the TJMK never keep a notebook. So wonder why this children show was only on since 1988-1992 & 1997 even after it was cancel twice. Do we all need to bring in a new whole team of GW back on air, and then people will start learning how to read and how to take notes. Right in the beginning it tells you bring in your notebook, to start a case of crime. No wonder TJMK never study criminal law!!!

Watch on youtube.com


Think and use your head, because it serious to take notes to know who did what and how it all ended, even that what count and I prove this message to the world of why Amanda Knox is innocent all along!!!
TMJ

Anne Hathaway number 1 fan

Free the Innocence 2

Free: Kirstin Lobato Las Vegas NV & Dusty Turner Norfolk VA
User avatar
ScifiTom
 
Posts: 4707
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:58 am
Location: Norfolk Va

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby ScifiTom » Fri Jul 11, 2014 7:58 am

To everyone

Hey everyone, is it me, or has Peter Quennell has lost it again of another sick money game of bloody Mary even that not what he call it. He mostly thinks Amanda is Bloody Mary, of crime wave and that is what he saying, even it not good enough, even some of it is sickening to death of what on earth has he wrote today. Plus he add a headache for Amanda. I won't give you the whole detail because it to sick. But anyway here the link and enjoy reading it!!!

http://www.truejustice.org/ee/index.php ... eir_hooks/

But what I will give you of what he said about Amanda Knox and here the official information!!!

The Bloodmoney Headache

There’s rarely much money to be made legally out of trashing murder victims and their families and justice officials as the Bruce Fischers have set out to do. Amanda Knox did get a windfall payment out of her hapless book - but is THAT turning into a two-edged sword…

There’s nothing like a huge pot of money unfairly distributed to make people who feel used and unrewarded walk off. So says Clive Wismayer in the text. Knox is clearly acting cheap, maybe because she sees no career ahead, and may have squirreled much of her bloodmoney away for the reasons given here.

Some like Ted Simon seem to have had a very big payday, the lawyers and experts and Marriott and travel and hotels have all had to be paid-for. Media sources tell us that none of their reporters get within miles of Sollecito or Knox without a greedy hand coming out.

And Knox still has to pay the damages awarded to Patrick for maliciously wrecking his life, or risk more time inside.

Knox is to be charged for the false claims in her book on the same lines as Sollecito and the damages awarded could be huge. Knox’s publishers have their own liability, but may have been misled, and if they are made to pay damages, they could set their lawyers on Knox.


So first he comes up with Clive, of there's nothing like a huge pot of money. Oh sure Peter because Amanda had an education even she gradulate from college even she gotten her degree of becoming a writer and your just jeasouly of being a pot of witchcraft!!!

Some like Ted Simon who had a big pay day, of lawyers who smoke the experts of Marriott. Did you know my Sister died from Smoke, when is it, that you think that smoking is bad for you. No wonder you are DUMB as a RED STONE WALL!!!

Amanda has to pay up Patrick, even it not her fault because the Italy police, attack her of abuse power until she said the name and you come up with that one. No wonder here we go again!!!

The Publishers do have their own liability of writing a book, the way, the story is told, but they missing nothing even why do they need to pay money for the damages, because you want this. No wonder, you an't getting it, and I an't buying this one. So grow up Peter Quennell, and enough is enough!!!
TMJ

Anne Hathaway number 1 fan

Free the Innocence 2

Free: Kirstin Lobato Las Vegas NV & Dusty Turner Norfolk VA
User avatar
ScifiTom
 
Posts: 4707
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:58 am
Location: Norfolk Va

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby ScifiTom » Wed Jul 16, 2014 12:59 pm

To everyone

Hey everyone, today is July 16, 2014 and once again Poor Peter goes over the rant into a PR Knox over killed through Raffaele Camp. But it also said: It going to hurt Knox herself. There more to this, even here the official link and I am going to give you detail as well of what he said and I will go at it in my own words!!!

http://www.truejustice.org/ee/index.php ... _reaction/

Act 1. Hubris Of The Knox Public Relations Described

A long report on Marriott’s PR appeared late in 2011 after Knox was provisionally released.


Now this is what the article is saying to us while Peter explain his own notes!!!

David Marriott never visited Amanda Knox during her four years in an Italian prison. He met her this month, when she stepped off a plane in Seattle.

Yet for Knox and her family, Marriott was as important a player in her ordeal as anyone in the courtroom. As Knox’s publicist, beginning three days after her arrest, Marriott worked to convince the international public that she did not murder her British roommate while studying in Perugia.

“Hiring him was one of the smartest things we ever did,” said Curt Knox, Amanda’s father.


Well course why would any family member would bring David Marriott, so what your point Peter with this whole thing?

Here what he said about it!!!

The article goes on to describe how family and friends were pushed into the limelight and specific big TV networks targeted. It talks about great financial opportunities for Knox.

Marriott himself demonstrates no understanding of the case - in fact. he sounds proud of his ignorance and his reflexively anti-Italy stance. To a smarter Curt Knox those might have been red flags.


He never understanding the whole case, even David Marriott, has been a person who might has studied a lot of work even it doesn't matter to you, even if he or she work on a case, even you proclaim that it must have red flag. A lot of times, a flag is just not a case, Peter. Sometimes when a lawyer or an investigation do the work, they like to hide the work, while a Prosecutor hide evidence and when they go through a file of incredmeant of cooking a magical meal, and said: Don't show the defense, even a defense lawyer will grab that proof and make millions of evidence and when he or she show it, and if the Judge doesn't know about it. It going to cause a huge reaction on Prosecutor case and he in a lot of trouble, and who Judge was that Peter? It was Judge Hellmann who totally prove his own wits, of how he catch the act of poor Prosecutor abuse his power of rage and attack over lying his way, to hurt an innocent person of to much damages to an innocent person!!!

Wise words for Marriott and Curt Knox. They have remained steadfastly ignorant of the enemy. The attack has clearly failed. Wall-to-wall Italy now has the upper hand. And the PR is a millstone around Knox’s neck.

Here are seven of the ways the Knox-Marriott campaign has fallen short and has actually done real harm.
1) The real case for conviction remains rock-solid with many times the number of evidence points that a US or UK court would require for guilt.

2) No paper trail helpful to Knox exists between the American Embassy and the State Department, and the extradition agreement is precise and firm.

3) Knox’s bedrock claim, that she was pressured into a false accusation, not only cost her three years for calunnia but will cost her a defamation trial.

4) The defamatory Knox book that was the windfall David Marriott so jubilantly talks about is turning into an albatross around Knox’s neck.

5) The blood money windfall will not remain Knox’s to keep, under Italian and American laws, and even Marriott’s fees could be at risk.

6) The PR is being unresponsive to ANY damaging claims, such as Knox’s attempted framing of Mignini, and its output is increasingly surreal junk.

7) The PR is making the Sollecito camp hostile, Italian media too; at the same time, since the failed appeal, the US media have chilled.
And so we see the slow death of a campaign built on xenophobia, racism, personal abuse, zero understanding of the details of the case, and zero understanding of the real Italy and its law.

Italy is actually rather a sucker for confession and penitence. Against a famously impervious justice system, the hard line was a terrible, terrible mistake.

Coming soon? “Firing him was one of the smartest things we ever did” says Curt Knox.


Hmmmmmm Peter all of these things you are saying right now is risk on your behalf because of zero understanding. The only thing being zero is you of not giving evidence, even come on why do we need a couple of love to ruin this death. No that like ignoring the real evidence, even it sound like sex, of one wanted sex, while the other didn't wanted sex, and it all compare to make sense, because if Amanda was with Raffaele, then Rudy was with Mereidth Kercher of the crime and sooner or later, it was a scene of love and murder, even it was all wrong that zero proof has nothing to do with Amanda or Raffaele, just plan Rudy, beside opps someone left evidence in the Potty, and to bad you never notice it, even it same world of how bad judgement you make around these cases, of not knowing criminal law!!!

Oh I almost forgot, firing him is coming soon. Oh wait a min it. Didn't you fired Michael. Yes you did, even how silly of me, even it still being posted on YouTube. No wonder you don't want to talk about it, even he still talks to you through PMF.net and I can see why, in so many ways!!!
TMJ

Anne Hathaway number 1 fan

Free the Innocence 2

Free: Kirstin Lobato Las Vegas NV & Dusty Turner Norfolk VA
User avatar
ScifiTom
 
Posts: 4707
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:58 am
Location: Norfolk Va

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby ScifiTom » Wed Oct 01, 2014 6:43 pm

To everyone

Bringing the media is a basic news of what happen to the world, and here what the TJMK have to say about media news!!!

http://www.truejustice.org/ee/index.php ... 4_mignini/

Knox has repeatedly claimed that Dr Mignini was present at the informal summary/recap session led by Inspector Rita Ficarra, the actual purpose of which was merely for Knox to suggest a few possible leads the police might interview.

He wasn’t there, though. And he has repeatedly explained that at the second session ending with a second insisted-upon statement by Knox at 5:45 AM, his entire role was to read Knox her rights, and to advise her to say no more until she had appointed lawyers. (Regardless, she then insisted on dictating that second statement.)


TJMK check your report, if a Prosecutor wasn't there, it is a job duty of question the cops of dectectives and it a duty of them, even it a crime of sexual crime of abuse, do we need to make it 7 vs 2 or 3. No we don't!!!

Dr Mignini had not himself testified at trial, and he led the testimony of others present on 5-6 November very fairly and without defense protests about any bias. And Dr Mignini is not under oath here. However this 20-minute segment is important, for it reinforces that Knox was treated extremely fairly and she had no genuine reason for complaint about it.


Dr Mignini, excuse he not a doctor, he a Prosecutor, seriously TJMK, if someone a doctor they must go to medical school, he a Prosecutor who does law, of incrediblie degree with the law, not to be tested of crime. He or she must stay with there lawyer, even haven't you watched the case. Duh this is not a doctor!!!

P S a doctor is someone who does work of checking there paient of working into a hospital. My god TJMK you need to learn more again, of what is what?

I truly love it, and here what they say next!!!

0’40’’ English question [Translator’s note: These words are in English in the Italian transcript of which this document is a translation.]

0’48’’ CNN: You didn’t interrogate Amanda?

0’50’’ Mignini: Oh, the police interrogated her. I was told about it. I wanted to explain this. I remember that I had gone to sleep and the director of the flying squad, Dr. Profazio, called me, because he tells me: “There are developments; Raffaele in fact has denied what he had said before”. So I went down and the head of the flying squad told me what had happened. At some point they tell us that Amanda has made this statement.

And thus her interrogation as a person informed of the facts was suspended by the police in compliance with Article 63 of the Italian Code of Criminal Procedure [c.p.p. - Codice di Procedura Penale], because if evidence appears that incriminates the person, the person being questioned as a person informed of the facts can no longer be heard, and we must stop. “Everyone stop! There must be a defense attorney [present]”. And thus the police stopped and informed Amanda, who had placed herself on the scene of the crime and who said that she had accompanied Lumumba and let him in and that then Lumumba, in the other room, allegedly committed a sexual act and killed Meredith. This is what she said.

2’11’’ Then I was called, I was informed about this, I went to Amanda who, I remember how she was, what she looked like, I remember her very well, she remained imprinted in my memory, I still remember then two things about Amanda that struck me at the time: first, she looked like she was relieved of a burden and second, she was like, and this is another detail that was impressive, it seemed as if she was terrified of Lumumba.

20’48’’ Then I, as I had in some way to, let’s say… this police interrogation had been suspended. At that point I remember that… they made me notice that Amanda, because she wanted to go on talking, I remember she had, like a need to. So I told her: “you can make statements to me; I will not ask questions, since if you make a spontaneous statement and I collect it, I will collect your statement as if I were in fact a notary”. She then repeated [her story] to the interpreter, who was Mrs. Donnino, I remember there was a police woman officer who wrote the statement down [verbalizzava], I did not ask questions. She basically repeated what she had told the police and she signed the statement. Basically I didn’t ask Amanda questions. Not before, since the police asked them and I was not there, and not after, since she made spontaneous statements. Had I been asking her questions, a defense attorney should have been there. This is the procedure.

05’24 CNN: She had an interpreter during the whole time?

05’26’’ Mignini: Yes.

05’29’’ CNN: She says no.

05’32’’ Mignini: Look the interpreter was there, when I heard her there was the interpreter. The interpreter Anna Donnino, who is an interpreter for the police; she was hired by the police.

Just like I believe that there was [before], I do not have the minutes now, but yet now this is a fact, it is undisputed that there was an interpreter.

06’02’’ CNN: Amanda Knox says she was interrogated for 14 hours…

06’11’’ Mignini: No, look, absolutely not. At 1 a.m., the minutes of Nov 6th has started at 1 a.m. and I arrived, 14 hours that cannot be, we are really… that’s absolutely impossible. So the minutes were done at one o’clock, then the minutes of the spontaneous declaration was taken at 5.45, it maybe lasted half an hour because no questions were asked. She made her statements; they were translated; then at around 8 a.m., I think, at approximately 8, I drew up the detention order. Thus it is… well, she had been heard earlier, so she had been questioned as a person informed of the facts at around one forty-five a.m. She had previously been heard by a female police officer, but [that’s] because she had gone voluntarily to the police and she reported that, she said things quite relevant to the investigation of Raffaele and was heard by the inspector [Rita] Ficarra. However this [event] ... I was not there, I do not know [about it]. But remember, there are the minutes. Then the minutes in which she was questioned as a person informed of the facts starts at 1:45 of November 6, and cannot have lasted 14 hours ... in no way whatsoever. Then she was arrested at around 8 a.m. or at about 9 a.m. or so.

08’16’’ Mignini: Look, I remember what I saw when I saw her personally, because she said, I told her: “you can make, if you deem it [necessary], a spontaneous statement, because Italian law provides for this. If a person is aware that he/she is suspected [under investigation], may request to speak before a magistrate, it happened many times, they came also to me, and they say “I want to make a statement”. Very well, I listen. If I listen, I wanted this to be highlighted…. to be clear, I listen and that’s all, and I ask no questions, the defense attorney may be not present. But if I ask questions and I object to the facts [of your answers], it is like an interrogation and thus we would need a defense attorney.

09’10’’ CNN: was [Amanda Knox] scared?

09’11’’ Mignini: Well, I recall this feeling that I had in that moment which, [as] I am explaining to you, in the spirit in which I am doing this interview, to explain to you the acceptance [adozione] of our requests [provvedimenti], what was, why the trial went in a certain way. [Translator’s note: The Italian in the CNN transcript is nearly incomprehensible. We have provided the foregoing on a best effort basis.]

09’36’’ She was, she seemed to me like she was uplifted, freed of a weight, and terrified of Lumumba. That’s an impression that has stayed with me, yet I don’t understand. I remember that there was a policeman who was called, from the SCO [Servizio Centrale Operativo] in Rome, who made an impression on me because he was very fatherly. She was crying as though freed of a great weight, and he was trying to console her. I remember there was also a policewoman who, well, she…[missing word?] and I’m sure that.. [missing word?] .. well, all that picture how it was described later… at that moment it wasn’t like that. Right then, there was a situation in which I was trying to console her, to encourage her, because actually we believed that she had told the truth.

11’03’’ CNN: No one hit her?

11’06’’ Mignini: No, look, absolutely not. I can state this in the most positive way, and then, let’s say… I wasn’t there when she was being questioned by police, the rooms are quite far away… you don’t know but I was… it’s quite far, there’s a corridor, and I was with the director, Dr. Porfazio, and she was being questioned in a different place. I also remember that passing through, I also saw Sollecito who was alone in a different room; he was also being questioned, as I recall. I don’t exclude…well…it’s clear that I wasn’t there, but I don’t believe that anything whatsoever happened, and in my presence absolutely not.

11’55’’ On the contrary, there was an attitude of… I mean they gave her [some] ... [missing word?] then she was like, you know, like someone crying from a sense of liberation, as though she had been freed. That was the attitude.

12’51’’ CNN: Why wasn’t there any video or transcript of those hours?

13’00’’ Mignini: Look, that’s, I was at the police station, and all the…let’s say…when I made investigations in my own office, I taped them. I taped them, we have an apparatus for that, and I transcribed them. For example, there’s the interrogation of the English girls, Meredith’s friends, it was all taped. The interrogations of Amanda in prison were taped, and then transcribed, and we have the transcripts of… But in a police station, at the very moment of the investigation it isn’t done, not with respect to Amanda or anyone else. Also because, I can tell you, today, even then, but today in particular, we have budget problems, budget problems that are not insignificant, which do not allow us to transcribe. Video is very important…I completely agree with you that videotaping is extremely important, we should be able to have a video recording of every statement [verbale di assunzione di informazioni] made Because what is said is very important, but it’s maybe even more important how it is said, the non-verbal language. Because from the non-verbal language you can [missing words].

15’14’’ Mignini: It isn’t only Amanda, it’s always like that. But I wanted to say that I agree with him that it’s fundamental, only there’s a problem, especially when the witnesses are so numerous, and in fact just recording, I mean recording the sound, isn’t enough according to me.

15’38’’ CNN: It doesn’t cost much, he says.

15’40’’ Mignini: Well we have significant budget problems, that’s what it is.

15’38’’ CNN: So in the end, you did get a confession. But then, everything that was written in the confession became a lie?

16’16’’ Mignini: But then, there was the fact that she placed herself at the scene of the crime, and Lumumba wasn’t there, together with the three of them, the two of them, but Rudy was there, according to the facts that emerged later. But the fact of having accused…and she’s even accused of calumny in regard to Lumumba, was an element that was very important from the point of view of her legal position at the trial. Why accuse someone of participating in a crime, placing yourself at the scene of a crime? Because with those declarations, she placed herself at the scene, at the place of the crime. And she placed someone there who was a complete stranger to it. Why did she do that? There is one detail that’s particularly significant. Above all when Lumumba was arrested and no one – if it hadn’t been for the Public Prosecutor’s Office that conducted the investigation, and that is mandated to seek elements in favor of the accused, Lumumba would have stayed in prison. But we investigated, and we saw that Lumumba wasn’t involved, that he was the object of calumny and so he was freed and the case against him was archived.

18’15’’ CNN: Was she asked to imagine what might have happened?

18’24’’ Mignini: No, absolutely not. Either you saw a person or you didn’t. I can’t ask someone what they imagine because it would be a question that doesn’t mean anything, that I even don’t understand.


Know what if nothing he understand, then why did he use an imagine cartoon into this whole case of playing a make believe character of some silly movie. Now that is imagine and let not forget about Jessica Rabbit of a she devil. Now who is telling the truth more, even I might not bring a good fact for the problem. But if CNN interview Mignini they wouldn't call him a doctor. They call him Prosecutor Mignini even it shows, in every detail of news including product and that is that and I prove this message to show why TJMK never study criminal law, of not follow a factor case!!!
TMJ

Anne Hathaway number 1 fan

Free the Innocence 2

Free: Kirstin Lobato Las Vegas NV & Dusty Turner Norfolk VA
User avatar
ScifiTom
 
Posts: 4707
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:58 am
Location: Norfolk Va

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby ScifiTom » Sun Oct 05, 2014 7:29 am

To everyone

Hey everyone, today TJMK opps did it again even this time, they never learn anything, today. So what they did TMJ? They attack the US Marine of not bringing him back to the USA, of why so many support him, even he lock up in New Mexico and here what they said today!!!

http://www.truejustice.org/ee/index.php ... itigating/

Sure but don't they know, that they got a lot of support why Americans politics is want him home in the USA, and here is that link right now!!!

http://www.c-span.org/video/?321767-1/h ... start=6333

Maybe it shows why so many cares for the innocent even they care for the rights of freedom with a fight. To bad that TJMK only care of a :jaw-dropping: guilt and they need to grow up and look at the real facts of not being attack!!!

Beside here a wonderful article of what Karen said about the trolls, even she ace it so well of doing a great job on it!!!

http://groundreport.com/meredith-kerchers-cyberbullies/

But do you know this is the month of October and when October comes, it means it time to punish the bullies of crime, just like TJMK and enough is enough, and I prove this message and that all I have to say today!!!
TMJ

Anne Hathaway number 1 fan

Free the Innocence 2

Free: Kirstin Lobato Las Vegas NV & Dusty Turner Norfolk VA
User avatar
ScifiTom
 
Posts: 4707
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:58 am
Location: Norfolk Va

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby ScifiTom » Sat Nov 08, 2014 8:45 am

To everyone

As knowing I never get many replies in here, of why on earth TJMK wrote this today. Maybe this will shock you that Poor Peter Quennell just thinks when Rudy Guede was going to stay in Jail of being rejected. It thinks it more bad time for Amanda & Raffaele, in the new year of 2015!!!

But for me, I disagree with him and here the link and some detail I will point out for the poor soul man!!!

http://www.truejustice.org/ee/index.php ... _bad_news/

Peter Quennell Wrote: Rudy Guede has been in prison at Viterbo for seven years less only several weeks now.

Despite his claims via closed-circuit TV that he has had an exemplary record and has nearly finished a college degree, the Italian parole oversight board in Rome has just declined his work release application.

Rudy Guede has been treated fairly, and does seem to have behaved himself, and there is zero evidence he was on a crime wave or dealt drugs or acted as a snitch for the Perugia police.

Despite that, he has never been given any breaks in the past seven years except as described here by the current system.

That post in fact reflects the view of a number of pro-victim Italian judges and prosecutors who personally incline toward the UK and US practice of plea bargaining under which the accused puts realistic evidence on the table and rolls over on accomplices and shows real remorse, in return for which lesser charges are arrived at.

The grounds for refusing work-release parole were not published, but if this is a way of pressuring Guede into further pressuring Knox and Sollecito? Go for it.


First Peter, he was a convicted drug dealer. He was punish into another crime!!!

Second Peter, there was a video shown of how he broke into a nursing home hospital, of not knowing what it means into criminal law!!!

Third Peter, Rudy might went to college, but mixing a lot of tan even he amitted that he did use the potty, even his dna was through the sex scene & bathroom. Beside, when someone take a dump of crap, it means that it fit the crime of him being guilty!!!

Fourth & Final he never got a break, it someone who committed a murder crime scene, they will have to spend there rest of time, of the last final years. But even Rudy spent 7yrs in jail, it means, he might have to spent, another 6 more years, of saying the year 2020 will be his time out of jail. But I could be wrong. I bet this whole case is going to end for Amanda & Raffaele in 2015, while both party move on there lives. But must move on his own life, until 2020. This is the way I see it. You see it a different way!!!
TMJ

Anne Hathaway number 1 fan

Free the Innocence 2

Free: Kirstin Lobato Las Vegas NV & Dusty Turner Norfolk VA
User avatar
ScifiTom
 
Posts: 4707
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:58 am
Location: Norfolk Va

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby MichaelB » Fri Nov 14, 2014 8:15 am

This is hilarious. Excellent work by crew member Matthew removing the creep before he did who knows what. Quennell does his usual threatening lawsuits blah blah and even offers to meet Branson to assist with the investigation!! :::lol:::

Peter Quennell's complaint to Sir Richard Branson after being booted off a Virgin Atlantic flight

Classy Move By Your Virgin Atlantic Staff, Sir Richard Branson

My mother may pass away today or tomorrow in England. She is now desperately ill. And last night.... well, last night, my wife Hope and I were thrown off a Virgin Atlantic flight from Kennedy to Heathrow to join her.

As described in my narrative below, which occupied me for the first half of Christmas Day, an irate passenger had apparently just destroyed my $1500 computer. And he and a self-important steward called Matthew were DESPERATE to get me off the flight before I could fire the computer up and actually prove it.

So here we still remain, in New York, until we fly late tonight. More than a day later. While my mother gradually fades away.

Sir Richard Branson, Chairman
Virgin Atlantic, Crawley, Sussex, England

Fax addresses: 011 44 1293 561 721, 011 44 1293 538 337, 011 44 1293 747 699, 011 44 1293 444 924, and 011 44 1293 448 262

Dear Sir Richard:

Complaint: Illegal Behavior On Flight 4 From JFK

Congratulations on V-A’s 21st. I work with an arm of the United Nations and have encouraged many to take your flights. I also have extensive contacts in Washington DC.

Please be so kind as to investigate this: one of your cabin-crew members, Matthew, seemed to condone two kinds of illegal behavior by another passenger on your flight 4 from JFK at 7:30 pm on Saturday 24 December.

This resulted in damage, seemingly terminal, to my $1500 notebook computer, and when I protested, the eviction of myself and my wife from the flight.

This is the full narrative.

1. On Friday 23 December, Dr Joshi of the Bristol Royal Infirmary (contactable via the ward number: 07928-3294) called me to say that my mother appeared to have only a day or two to live, and that I should get there soonest.

2. I booked the first flight that came up on Orbitz, your Saturday Flight 4, for my wife Hope and myself.

3. We arrived for the flight from Manhattan in good time. The check-in clerk bungled our request for seating - my wife wanted any aisle seat and I wanted any window seat, but she placed my wife in a center seat on Row 37; and myself in a window seat on Row 59. No matter.

4. I stowed my computer bag and a good Italian overcoat and suit-jacket at one side of the overhead locker several rows forward; the only available space in the area.

5. A passenger then arrived with a suitcase with wheels that would be approximately 50 percent above the legal size limit. Apparently no Virgin Atlantic staff at any point had told him "you must stow it - this is way over the legal limit".

6. He made perhaps 8-10 increasingly angry attempts to push the suitcase into the locker vertically. There was an overhang at the bottom of about four inches.

7. He then angrily hauled my clothes out of the locker, and dropped them on the seat. He hauled my computer bag out of the locker and the weight of it caught him unawares; it crashed perhaps eight feet to the floor.

8. He looked around and then very hurriedly loaded his suitcase horizontally into the locker. Equally hurriedly he reloaded my computer bag, bundled my cloths into a large ball and stuffed them in back, looked round again (not seeing me) and hurriedly sat down.

9. At that point, I know now, my computer was already a seeming write-off.

10. I rose and protested to the passenger that he had just dropped a $1500 computer and bundled my clothes up. His rage was instant, and there was considerable low-level swearing.

11. I moved all my gear to another emptier locker that was pointed out by another passenger.

12. Presumably realizing that the moment the flight was in the air, I would attempt to fire up the computer, find it broken, and stick him with a $1500 tab, the passenger started complaining to cabin staff.

13. Your steward Matthew then pulled me out of my seat and rather aggressively asked me to calm down. (I was completely calm before he approached me.) At least five times, I indicated that damage had probably been done to my computer by a passenger with an illegally oversize bag, and that he should check both that bag and my computer. He refused each time, no reason given, and I sat down.

14. Presumably both Matthew and the passenger now realized that when the flight was in the air I would try to fire up my computer to see if it was damaged.

15. Five minutes later, Matthew was back with two senior VA ground crew and asked me to leave the flight. He said another carrier might take me that night. He said the passenger was nervous of me. (Give me a break; I had just witnessed a classic case of low-level criminal behavior.)

16. All three VA staff seemed distinctly surprised and in fact quite nervous when I told them I also had a wife on the flight.

17. When my wife and I were back at the door of the aircraft and talking finally to Matthew, another of your crew made the kind of gesture with his eyes to me that said: “Matthew is just like that. Don’t blame us!� Chatting later, one of your senior ground crew later said “Yes he is like that� which might mean that Matthew has a certain track record or reputation..

18. Your (sympathetic) gate crew tried hard to place us on any of the many half-full flights Saturday night; but the Orbitz ticket was not transferable. No coupon was issued for another airline; a staff member of another airline tells me it should have been.

19. We are now booked on the very next VA flight an astounding 26 hours later. I have no report today Sunday of my mother’s condition.

20. The computer has now failed to fire up. Having seen the force of the impact, my guess is that the damage to the drive and so on is terminal. It is a 15-inch Toshiba.

At no time did Matthew (1) check my computer, (2) check the other passenger’s suitcase, or (3) ask any passengers if they had witnessed my computer being hauled to the floor.

Please initiate an investigation? Obviously I know the possibilities via a lawsuit, and media coverage, and a complaint to the FAA and to Congressional contacts.

However, I will hold back on these fronts pending your own investigation, and will be happy to assist you if requested.

I will be in Bristol at 079-738-690 through 7 January, and then back in NYC. I could visit Crawley to discuss if that would assist you.

Kind regards. Pity your staff hasten and sadden the end of old ladies. But good airline otherwise.

Yours sincerely
Peter M Quennell
The stupid things Ergon says - THE BEST OF NASEER AHMAD: "Curatolo's testimony is one of the bedrock foundations of my beliefs in this case."
User avatar
MichaelB
 
Posts: 6172
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 10:07 pm
Location: Perryville Prison

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby Annella » Fri Nov 14, 2014 3:44 pm

So glad you found this again!!! I thought it was lost forever and that would have been sad. Poor Pete. :lol: :lol: :lol:
'The Italian concept of judicial truth does not trouble itself with reality; it controls the narrative by controlling the past"
User avatar
Annella
 
Posts: 1429
Joined: Tue Oct 25, 2011 6:19 pm

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby ScifiTom » Sun Nov 23, 2014 8:16 am

To everyone

Hey everyone, I am going to go with a section of something I have never done, even I might not be good enough, of showing it. Beside course you read it? But it never responds. I know that I go by own way, of criminal law into of reading a book and why TJMK never learn anything into a court of law. So today I found this article that TJMK just updated this on there website and it all about Selene article and she wrote the story of lies into the PR lies. The whole article is mostly good. But like a support of Amanda Knox, she too bring up about the lies of Amanda as well. So let me explain my detail of different ways. But first I am going to let you read this, and I will make another issue of the lies into my next respond, soon enough. So please respond if you wish and talk to you soon!!!

http://elitedaily.com/news/world/amanda ... er/850269/
TMJ

Anne Hathaway number 1 fan

Free the Innocence 2

Free: Kirstin Lobato Las Vegas NV & Dusty Turner Norfolk VA
User avatar
ScifiTom
 
Posts: 4707
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:58 am
Location: Norfolk Va

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby ScifiTom » Sun Nov 23, 2014 8:43 am

To everyone

Hey everyone, I am off again of another spin. I should update my time of being defending champion through Golden Globe & The Oscars of Best picture award. I did win Golden Globe 3 times. But I won the Oscars 2 times. So here is my choice of Best Picture who going to win for both awards!!!

So Drum Roll please
Scroll Down












Watch on youtube.com


Yep I am going with this movie for a sure win and it my number 1 choice. I know everyone going to hate me. But it my number 1 choice of the win and that is were I leave it and talk to you soon everyone!!!
TMJ

Anne Hathaway number 1 fan

Free the Innocence 2

Free: Kirstin Lobato Las Vegas NV & Dusty Turner Norfolk VA
User avatar
ScifiTom
 
Posts: 4707
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:58 am
Location: Norfolk Va

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby ScifiTom » Tue Dec 09, 2014 1:05 pm

To everyone

Ok everyone, get ready to get another :jaw-dropping: moment that TJMK True Justice of Meredith Kercher just went to inside of an Art victim of not knowing. So here what Oyduess said about art working detail of the unknown!!!

Image

Oyduess Wrote: Case Of Amanda Knox

It seems likely that humiliation was a major factor in the events leading up to the murder of Meredith. TJMK has carried various posts summarising why so many suspect this.

It would have been undoubtedly humiliating for Knox to find that her housemate Meredith was more popular with, and attractive to, both men and women in their social circle, as well as being more mature, intelligent and just more present than her (i.e. less driven to desperately act out unconscious emotions).

Then to cap it all off, on Halloween Knox found herself left out of the group that partied till the early hours. Plus of course there was the looming humiliation of Meredith taking over her job at the Le Chic. Was her money also running out?

If so the loss of a job, however small, would be threatening, and she might well have anticipated the humiliation of asking her parents for a loan or of returning home before the end of her course.

So it seems that the stage was set for the night of the “prank” when the plan (if that’s the right word. Jokey impulse, more likely) was for Meredith to find out just what it’s like to feel humiliated. And the prank got out of control, as pranks often can when drugs and/or alcohol are involved.

Again the origin of Knox’s suppressed emotion and false self construction might lie in her parent’s explosive separation or earlier in primal events. In either case she was probably destined to become a suitable (but unfortunately not an actual) case for treatment.

Knox’s narcissism has of course been much discussed. At bottom narcissism is an inability to just be, in the present. An inability to stay with one’s core self (Jung’s “The Self”). The narcissist’s attention is constantly directed to how they look to the world, from the outside, not on how world appears to them from the inside looking out. They are really not fully born, literally and metaphorically.



So Oyduess thinks Knox discussion is a core self picture of the unknown (Jung's " The Self") So are we talking a prank? No we aren't talking about a prank, even it sound like a painting of puddle to be wash, even if he or she let say that, were working inside a local grocery store and some how they spill something. Well it his or her fault to clean up a mess, even a lot of time customers drop thinks to make a spill and it the employe to do the work. Sometimes the customers apolized if he or she made the spill or did they do it on natural action of bad behavior. It means you just want to hurt the store of unknown to be a clean fiction into a fairy tale. Odyuess I can play your game? But with my bad grammar or not so good. Here is a picture of clean up work!!!

Image

See what I mean and who going to clean it. A customer? No, the employe will clean it instead, even yes it more true factor of common sense and I prove this message to the world, and talk to you soon everyone!!!
TMJ

Anne Hathaway number 1 fan

Free the Innocence 2

Free: Kirstin Lobato Las Vegas NV & Dusty Turner Norfolk VA
User avatar
ScifiTom
 
Posts: 4707
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:58 am
Location: Norfolk Va

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby ScifiTom » Sat Dec 13, 2014 6:44 pm

To everyone

Hey everyone, it is another sucker day, of why is Peter Quennell just went to this. I truly love it, that he totally believes that no one in the state of Italy believe Amanda & Raffaele is innocent. So here is the whole information and enjoy reading it!!!

http://www.truejustice.org/ee/index.php ... innocence/

Has Peter lost his mind, even if I go to Italy, and course I will in the near future. I can believe I can find not one, but more then anyone in the world that their got to be someone in Italy, to believe the innocent of AK & RS. I truly love it, that this man only thinks Italy is a hater for the injustice system!!!
TMJ

Anne Hathaway number 1 fan

Free the Innocence 2

Free: Kirstin Lobato Las Vegas NV & Dusty Turner Norfolk VA
User avatar
ScifiTom
 
Posts: 4707
Joined: Fri Aug 27, 2010 7:58 am
Location: Norfolk Va

Re: Today over at TJMK

Postby KayPea » Sat Dec 13, 2014 7:39 pm

Not just mere groupies anymore, but killer-groupies. How drahmahtic.
“If it is not right do not do it; if it is not true do not say it.”-- Marcus Aurelius
User avatar
KayPea
 
Posts: 3310
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 11:40 pm
Location: Seattle WA

PreviousNext

Return to Injustice in Perugia Forum

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests

cron